Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Iraq
Iraq: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 58.44 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Iraq, 1974–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Iraq is 58.44 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 14.6% on the previous year and down 22.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Iraq peaked at 636.19 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0229 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1987.
That places Iraq 41st out of 141 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Iraq, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1974 | 0.0915 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0.503 current US$ per square kilometre | +450.0% |
| 1979 | 0.2058 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.1% |
| 1981 | 0.1829 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1982 | 0.1372 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0457 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1984 | 0.0457 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0229 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1990 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +6700.0% |
| 1991 | 22.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +1361.8% |
| 1992 | 28.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 1993 | 27.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1994 | 40.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.1% |
| 1995 | 65.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.4% |
| 1996 | 78.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 1997 | 101.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.7% |
| 1998 | 17.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.3% |
| 1999 | 19.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 2000 | 16.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 2001 | 8.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.5% |
| 2002 | 10.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2003 | 27.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +169.6% |
| 2004 | 48.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.6% |
| 2005 | 25.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.1% |
| 2006 | 636.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +2368.9% |
| 2007 | 39.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.8% |
| 2008 | 60.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.6% |
| 2009 | 57.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2010 | 56.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2011 | 81.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.6% |
| 2012 | 80.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2013 | 75.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2014 | 98.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 2015 | 55.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.5% |
| 2016 | 88.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.8% |
| 2017 | 79.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2018 | 104.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 2019 | 80.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 2020 | 98.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 2021 | 104.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2022 | 68.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.4% |
| 2023 | 58.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.2667 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0915 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.503 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1980s | 0.0869 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0229 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1829 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1990s | 40.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 101.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 93.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 636.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 80.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 104.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 82.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 58.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 104.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Iraq
- 38 Jordan 61.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Yemen 61.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Myanmar 59.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Türkiye 54.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Zambia 53.35 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Togo 45.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Iraq
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 1.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 36.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 142.39 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 14.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 333.16 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 19.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 27.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -1.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 977.20 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Iraq?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Iraq was 58.44 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Iraq?
- The highest recorded value was 636.19 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Iraq?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0229 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987.
- How does Iraq rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Iraq ranks 41st out of 141 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Iraq?
- Over the last ten years it is down 22.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Iraq data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.