Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Middle income
Middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 16.05 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
16.05 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 6.1%
Rank
28th
of 46 groups
All-time high
19.06 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2006
All-time low
0.0058 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Middle income is 16.05 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 6.1% on the previous year and up 4.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Middle income peaked at 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0058 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Middle income 28th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0058 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.027 current US$ per square kilometre | +361.8% |
| 1963 | 0.0868 current US$ per square kilometre | +221.7% |
| 1964 | 0.1761 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.8% |
| 1965 | 0.2296 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 1967 | 0.2769 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1968 | 0.4342 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.8% |
| 1969 | 0.6129 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.1% |
| 1970 | 0.6261 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1971 | 0.8325 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.0% |
| 1972 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.3% |
| 1973 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.7% |
| 1974 | 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.1% |
| 1975 | 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.4% |
| 1976 | 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1977 | 6.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1978 | 5.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1979 | 8 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.7% |
| 1980 | 8.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1981 | 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 1982 | 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1983 | 5.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1984 | 5.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1985 | 5.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1986 | 8.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.6% |
| 1987 | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1988 | 8.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.3% |
| 1989 | 11.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 1990 | 11.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1991 | 13.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1992 | 14.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1993 | 12.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 1994 | 10.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1995 | 10.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1996 | 12.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 1997 | 10.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 1998 | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 1999 | 8.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2000 | 9.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 2001 | 8.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 2002 | 7.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2003 | 10.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 2004 | 12.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 2005 | 13.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2006 | 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 2007 | 15.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 2008 | 15.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2009 | 14.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2010 | 13.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2011 | 15.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 2012 | 14.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2013 | 15.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2014 | 14.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 2015 | 11.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 2016 | 12.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2017 | 14.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 2018 | 14.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2019 | 13.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 2020 | 13.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2021 | 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 2022 | 15.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 2023 | 16.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2312 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0058 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6129 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 3.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6261 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 7.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 11.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 12.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 14.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle income
- 25 Estonia 108.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 El Salvador 104.91 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Mozambique 97.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Maldives 96.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Latvia 92.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Cambodia 91.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Montenegro 88.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 373.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 293.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.42 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 6.29 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.17 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 463.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.26 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Middle income was 16.05 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0058 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Middle income ranks 28th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.