Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Morocco
Morocco: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Morocco, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Morocco is 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 11.1% on the previous year and up 88.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Morocco peaked at 23.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0.0224 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1968.
That places Morocco 111th out of 141 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Morocco, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 0.0896 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0.0224 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0672 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0448 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1989 | 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +30700.1% |
| 1990 | 5.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.7% |
| 1991 | 5.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1992 | 23.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +368.4% |
| 1993 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.9% |
| 1994 | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.6% |
| 1995 | 2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1996 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.8% |
| 1997 | 0.7618 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.5% |
| 1998 | 0.7394 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1999 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.8% |
| 2000 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.3% |
| 2001 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.9% |
| 2002 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.3% |
| 2003 | 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2004 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 2005 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2006 | 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +176.4% |
| 2007 | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 2008 | 0.0672 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.7% |
| 2009 | 0.0224 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2010 | 0.0448 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2012 | 0.2465 current US$ per square kilometre | +450.0% |
| 2013 | 0.9985 current US$ per square kilometre | +305.1% |
| 2014 | 0.624 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 2015 | 0.6336 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2016 | 0.5242 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 2017 | 0.5796 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2018 | 0.451 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 2019 | 0.429 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2020 | 0.6804 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.6% |
| 2021 | 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +315.5% |
| 2022 | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 2023 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.056 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0224 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0896 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1970s | 0.056 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0448 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0672 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1980s | 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1990s | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7394 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0224 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5035 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0448 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9985 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2020s | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6804 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Morocco
- 108 Gabon 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 109 Paraguay 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 110 Slovakia 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 112 India 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 113 Malaysia 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 114 Indonesia 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Morocco
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 1.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 8.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 175.08 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 6.43 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 150.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 278.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -779,820 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -3.47 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Morocco?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Morocco was 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Morocco?
- The highest recorded value was 23.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Morocco?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0224 current US$ per square kilometre in 1968.
- How does Morocco rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Morocco ranks 111th out of 141 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Morocco?
- Over the last ten years it is up 88.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Morocco data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 38 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.