Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Pakistan
Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
11.17 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 28.7%
World rank
82nd
of 141 countries
All-time high
55.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
0.2594 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1974
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Pakistan, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Pakistan is 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 28.7% on the previous year and down 47.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Pakistan peaked at 55.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0.2594 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1974.
That places Pakistan 82nd out of 141 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.3762 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.454 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1963 | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +337.1% |
| 1964 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1965 | 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.4% |
| 1967 | 4.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.8% |
| 1968 | 13.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +173.6% |
| 1969 | 12.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1970 | 13.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1971 | 11.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1972 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.1% |
| 1973 | 0.7264 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.1% |
| 1974 | 0.2594 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.3% |
| 1975 | 5.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +2180.0% |
| 1976 | 3.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.3% |
| 1977 | 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1978 | 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +327.0% |
| 1979 | 12.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1980 | 15.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 1981 | 13.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 1982 | 12.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1983 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.0% |
| 1984 | 0.921 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 1985 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1986 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.7% |
| 1987 | 5.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +328.9% |
| 1988 | 5.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1989 | 14.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +181.8% |
| 1990 | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.4% |
| 1991 | 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.0% |
| 1992 | 3.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1993 | 4.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1994 | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1995 | 17.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +293.0% |
| 1996 | 10.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.0% |
| 1997 | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.9% |
| 1998 | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1999 | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.8% |
| 2000 | 2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.2% |
| 2001 | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.9% |
| 2002 | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 2003 | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 2005 | 11.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +343.7% |
| 2006 | 15.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.8% |
| 2007 | 18.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 2008 | 11.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.7% |
| 2009 | 17.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.5% |
| 2010 | 55.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +212.8% |
| 2011 | 28.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.2% |
| 2012 | 18.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.0% |
| 2013 | 21.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 2014 | 29.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.6% |
| 2015 | 16.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.3% |
| 2016 | 16.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2017 | 11.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 2018 | 9.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 2019 | 8.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2020 | 6.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2021 | 7.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2022 | 15.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.6% |
| 2023 | 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3762 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 6.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2594 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 7.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.921 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 21.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 10.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
- 79 Philippines 11.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 80 Sierra Leone 11.66 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 81 Fiji 11.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 83 Viet Nam 9.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 84 Côte d'Ivoire 8.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 85 Panama 8.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Pakistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 7.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 28,763 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 31.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany -14.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 19.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 84.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 13.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -138.02 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Pakistan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Pakistan was 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 55.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2594 current US$ per square kilometre in 1974.
- How does Pakistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Pakistan ranks 82nd out of 141 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 47.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.