Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 38.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
38.09 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 19.0%
World rank
51st
of 141 countries
All-time high
824.75 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
0.4784 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1970
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Sri Lanka, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Sri Lanka recorded 38.09 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 19.0% on the previous year and down 36.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Sri Lanka peaked at 824.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.4784 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 141 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.6379 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.6379 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1964 | 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1965 | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +115.4% |
| 1967 | 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1968 | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 1969 | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.4% |
| 1970 | 0.4784 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.0% |
| 1971 | 27.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +5700.0% |
| 1972 | 12.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.2% |
| 1973 | 53.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +330.8% |
| 1974 | 60.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1975 | 148.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +145.5% |
| 1976 | 144 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1977 | 186.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 1978 | 218.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1979 | 564.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +158.6% |
| 1980 | 368.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 1981 | 362.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1982 | 402.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1983 | 450.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1984 | 515.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1985 | 530.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1986 | 382.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 1987 | 317.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 1988 | 114.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.0% |
| 1989 | 100.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 1990 | 168.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.0% |
| 1991 | 214.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 1992 | 193.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1993 | 191.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1994 | 135.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.0% |
| 1995 | 197.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.2% |
| 1996 | 198.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1997 | 221.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1998 | 205.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1999 | 227.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2000 | 266.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 2001 | 291.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2002 | 239.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 2003 | 215.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2004 | 365.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.1% |
| 2005 | 824.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.4% |
| 2006 | 327.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.2% |
| 2007 | 367.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 2008 | 247.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.9% |
| 2009 | 291.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2010 | 176.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.7% |
| 2011 | 206.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 2012 | 76.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.1% |
| 2013 | 60.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.8% |
| 2014 | 101.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.3% |
| 2015 | 29.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.3% |
| 2016 | 36.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 2017 | 35.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2018 | 32.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2019 | 41.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 2020 | 32.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.8% |
| 2021 | 42.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 2022 | 47.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2023 | 38.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6379 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 141.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4784 current US$ per square kilometre | 564.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 354.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 100.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 530.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 195.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 135.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 227.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 343.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 215.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 824.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 79.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 206.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 40.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
- 48 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 40.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 49 Eswatini 40.3 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 50 Comoros 38.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 52 Mali 36.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 53 Guinea-Bissau 33.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 54 Honduras 32.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sri Lanka
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 743,046 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 104,629 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.69 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 26.12 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.01 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 9.57 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 441,093 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 76.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Sri Lanka?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Sri Lanka was 38.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 824.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4784 current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Sri Lanka ranks 51st out of 141 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is down 36.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.