Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 44.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
44.4 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 3.8%
Rank
9th
of 46 groups
All-time high
61.64 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
0.0199 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) recorded 44.4 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.8% on the previous year and down 6.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) peaked at 61.64 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0199 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 9th of 46 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0199 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0328 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0869 current US$ per square kilometre | +165.2% |
| 1964 | 0.141 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.3% |
| 1965 | 0.2011 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.6% |
| 1967 | 0.5953 current US$ per square kilometre | +196.0% |
| 1968 | 0.9558 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.6% |
| 1969 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 1970 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1971 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1972 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.3% |
| 1973 | 3.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.2% |
| 1974 | 3.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1975 | 6.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.1% |
| 1976 | 7.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1977 | 9.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.7% |
| 1978 | 9.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1979 | 14.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.9% |
| 1980 | 16.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1981 | 14.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1982 | 13.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1983 | 12.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1984 | 12.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1985 | 12.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1986 | 19.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.7% |
| 1987 | 19.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1988 | 26.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 1989 | 26.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1990 | 33.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 1991 | 37.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1992 | 35.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 1993 | 25.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 1994 | 21.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 1995 | 19.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 1996 | 22.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 1997 | 19.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1998 | 17.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1999 | 17.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2000 | 18.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2001 | 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 2002 | 19.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 2003 | 31.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.7% |
| 2004 | 31.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2005 | 37.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2006 | 41.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2007 | 46.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2008 | 47.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2009 | 42.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 2010 | 40.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 2011 | 61.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.4% |
| 2012 | 49.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 2013 | 47.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2014 | 45.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2015 | 35.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 2016 | 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2017 | 42.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 2018 | 48.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 2019 | 46.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2020 | 48.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2021 | 61.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 2022 | 46.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 2023 | 44.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4117 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0199 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 5.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 17.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 24.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 33.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 45.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 50.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- 6 Albania 442.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Ukraine 415.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Bosnia and Herzegovina 361.1 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 North Macedonia 358.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Liberia 345.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Georgia 315.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Haiti 312.34 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 121.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 460.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.49 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.04 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 658.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.95 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.40 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 303.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.70 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) was 44.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 61.64 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0199 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 9th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.