Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Tunisia
Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 7.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
7.5 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 11.3%
World rank
88th
of 141 countries
All-time high
121.97 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1990
All-time low
-5.34 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1989
Years of data
59
1963–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Tunisia, 1963–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Tunisia recorded 7.5 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 11.3% on the previous year and down 78.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Tunisia peaked at 121.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990 and was at its lowest, -5.34 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1989.
Tunisia ranks 88th of 141 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1963 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 10.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +956.2% |
| 1965 | 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.1% |
| 1967 | 6.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1968 | 8.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.4% |
| 1969 | 17.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +110.7% |
| 1970 | 24.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.2% |
| 1971 | 14.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.3% |
| 1972 | 30.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.3% |
| 1973 | 58.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.4% |
| 1974 | 76.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.1% |
| 1975 | 86.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1976 | 74.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 1977 | 91.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 1978 | 45.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.3% |
| 1979 | 46.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1980 | 39.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 1981 | 10.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.9% |
| 1982 | 3.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.7% |
| 1983 | 10.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +153.2% |
| 1984 | 6.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 1985 | 0.1931 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.1% |
| 1986 | 28.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +14633.4% |
| 1987 | -3.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -110.9% |
| 1988 | 10.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -437.5% |
| 1989 | -5.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -151.2% |
| 1990 | 121.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -2383.1% |
| 1991 | 50.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.9% |
| 1992 | 46.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1993 | 14.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.7% |
| 1994 | 47.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +233.0% |
| 1995 | 7.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.0% |
| 1996 | 7.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1997 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.4% |
| 1998 | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 1999 | 9.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +259.5% |
| 2000 | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.2% |
| 2001 | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2002 | 0.6437 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.7% |
| 2003 | 3.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +500.0% |
| 2004 | 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2005 | 3.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 2006 | 4.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.0% |
| 2007 | 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 2008 | 0.6437 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.4% |
| 2009 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +450.0% |
| 2011 | 49.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +1310.9% |
| 2012 | 28.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.7% |
| 2013 | 34.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 2014 | 37.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2015 | 23.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 2016 | 8.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.7% |
| 2017 | 16.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.9% |
| 2018 | 18.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2019 | 8.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.4% |
| 2020 | 9.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 2021 | 16.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.5% |
| 2022 | 8.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.3% |
| 2023 | 7.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 1970s | 55.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 91.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 10.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 31.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 121.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6437 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 24.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 49.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2020s | 10.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 85 Panama 8.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 86 Lao People's Democratic Republic 7.87 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 87 Niger 7.76 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 89 Bulgaria 7.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 90 Vanuatu 7.35 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 91 Republic of Korea 7.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tunisia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 696,474 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 134,083 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 95.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 32.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 213.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 46.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 4.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 31.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 162.74 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Tunisia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Tunisia was 7.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 121.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was -5.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989.
- How does Tunisia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Tunisia ranks 88th out of 141 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 78.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.