Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 12.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
12.21 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 13.6%
Rank
31st
of 46 groups
All-time high
13.12 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2006
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Upper middle income recorded 12.21 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 13.6% on the previous year and up 67.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Upper middle income peaked at 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Upper middle income 31st out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0112 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.015 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0577 current US$ per square kilometre | +285.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0147 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.5% |
| 1967 | 0.027 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.1% |
| 1968 | 0.0065 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.9% |
| 1969 | 0.0197 current US$ per square kilometre | +203.8% |
| 1970 | 0.0819 current US$ per square kilometre | +315.2% |
| 1971 | 0.1074 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.1% |
| 1972 | 0.0839 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 1973 | 0.1798 current US$ per square kilometre | +114.3% |
| 1974 | 0.4877 current US$ per square kilometre | +171.2% |
| 1975 | 0.4787 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1976 | 0.6099 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 1977 | 0.8022 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 1978 | 0.7165 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1979 | 0.8571 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 1980 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1981 | 0.8546 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.9% |
| 1982 | 0.7035 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 1983 | 0.703 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1984 | 0.5776 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.8% |
| 1985 | 0.7672 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 1986 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.9% |
| 1987 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1988 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.1% |
| 1989 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1990 | 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 1991 | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.9% |
| 1992 | 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 1993 | 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1994 | 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 1995 | 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1996 | 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1997 | 4.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1998 | 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.6% |
| 1999 | 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 2000 | 3.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2001 | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2002 | 3.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 2003 | 4.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.0% |
| 2004 | 5.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2005 | 5.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2006 | 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +121.7% |
| 2007 | 7.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.9% |
| 2008 | 7.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2009 | 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2010 | 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2011 | 8.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 2012 | 7.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2013 | 7.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2014 | 7.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2015 | 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 2016 | 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2017 | 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2018 | 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2019 | 6.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2020 | 7.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2021 | 8.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 2022 | 10.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 2023 | 12.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.019 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0577 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 0.4405 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0819 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8571 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5776 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 28 Maldives 96.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Latvia 92.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Cambodia 91.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Montenegro 88.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Zimbabwe 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Kenya 79.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 South Sudan 77.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Upper middle income was 12.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Upper middle income ranks 31st out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 67.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.