Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in China
China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in China, 1979–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
China recorded 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 44 years on record.
That represents a change of down 19.8% on the previous year and down 91.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in China peaked at 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1989 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
That places China 140th out of 141 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in China, year by year
| Year | current US$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1093.2% |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -79.8% |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +113.4% |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +16.8% |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1112.1% |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -43.0% |
| 1987 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +274.5% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +77.6% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -27.7% |
| 1991 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -71.8% |
| 1992 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +190.3% |
| 1993 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +9.7% |
| 1994 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -61.1% |
| 1995 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -32.9% |
| 1996 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 1997 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -65.6% |
| 1998 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +40.9% |
| 1999 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -65.1% |
| 2000 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +161.4% |
| 2001 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 2002 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -42.3% |
| 2003 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 2004 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +152.1% |
| 2005 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -52.8% |
| 2006 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 2007 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -31.1% |
| 2008 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +8.0% |
| 2009 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -55.5% |
| 2010 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -20.4% |
| 2011 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +16.1% |
| 2012 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 2013 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 2014 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -73.1% |
| 2015 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 2016 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -36.8% |
| 2017 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +26.2% |
| 2018 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +21.1% |
| 2019 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -28.1% |
| 2020 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 2021 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2022 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -20.3% |
| 2023 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -19.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 1 |
| 1980s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1990s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
- 137 Jamaica 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 138 Chile 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 139 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 141 Turkmenistan 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
More aid effectiveness data for China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 100,022 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada -11.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 216.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -48.60 million current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -8.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -521.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in China was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1989.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- China ranks 140th out of 141 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 91.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.