Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) was 860.66 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1970–2022
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) is 860.66 million current US$, measured in 2022.
The figure is down 24.0% on the previous year and up 7.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 1.13 billion current US$ in 2011 and was at its lowest, 15.97 million current US$, in 1970.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 12th of 46 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 15.97 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 19.76 million current US$ | +23.7% |
| 1972 | 28.64 million current US$ | +44.9% |
| 1973 | 47.71 million current US$ | +66.6% |
| 1974 | 50.54 million current US$ | +5.9% |
| 1975 | 104.09 million current US$ | +106.0% |
| 1976 | 102.52 million current US$ | -1.5% |
| 1977 | 144.54 million current US$ | +41.0% |
| 1978 | 138.40 million current US$ | -4.2% |
| 1979 | 214.51 million current US$ | +55.0% |
| 1980 | 212.10 million current US$ | -1.1% |
| 1981 | 185.44 million current US$ | -12.6% |
| 1982 | 196.26 million current US$ | +5.8% |
| 1983 | 179.26 million current US$ | -8.7% |
| 1984 | 153.06 million current US$ | -14.6% |
| 1985 | 159.08 million current US$ | +3.9% |
| 1986 | 291.58 million current US$ | +83.3% |
| 1987 | 245.97 million current US$ | -15.6% |
| 1988 | 394.56 million current US$ | +60.4% |
| 1989 | 386.98 million current US$ | -1.9% |
| 1990 | 464.20 million current US$ | +20.0% |
| 1991 | 583.55 million current US$ | +25.7% |
| 1992 | 468.24 million current US$ | -19.8% |
| 1993 | 378.41 million current US$ | -19.2% |
| 1994 | 334.17 million current US$ | -11.7% |
| 1995 | 328.66 million current US$ | -1.6% |
| 1996 | 378.09 million current US$ | +15.0% |
| 1997 | 301.73 million current US$ | -20.2% |
| 1998 | 269.22 million current US$ | -10.8% |
| 1999 | 301.35 million current US$ | +11.9% |
| 2000 | 352.41 million current US$ | +16.9% |
| 2001 | 315.50 million current US$ | -10.5% |
| 2002 | 345.91 million current US$ | +9.6% |
| 2003 | 592.89 million current US$ | +71.4% |
| 2004 | 603.79 million current US$ | +1.8% |
| 2005 | 687.92 million current US$ | +13.9% |
| 2006 | 735.39 million current US$ | +6.9% |
| 2007 | 862.33 million current US$ | +17.3% |
| 2008 | 877.91 million current US$ | +1.8% |
| 2009 | 758.93 million current US$ | -13.6% |
| 2010 | 786.16 million current US$ | +3.6% |
| 2011 | 1.13 billion current US$ | +44.3% |
| 2012 | 801.14 million current US$ | -29.4% |
| 2013 | 909.00 million current US$ | +13.5% |
| 2014 | 820.98 million current US$ | -9.7% |
| 2015 | 728.59 million current US$ | -11.3% |
| 2016 | 716.72 million current US$ | -1.6% |
| 2017 | 865.95 million current US$ | +20.8% |
| 2018 | 1.01 billion current US$ | +17.2% |
| 2019 | 915.45 million current US$ | -9.8% |
| 2020 | 905.65 million current US$ | -1.1% |
| 2021 | 1.13 billion current US$ | +25.1% |
| 2022 | 860.66 million current US$ | -24.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 86.67 million current US$ | 15.97 million current US$ | 214.51 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 240.43 million current US$ | 153.06 million current US$ | 394.56 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 380.76 million current US$ | 269.22 million current US$ | 583.55 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 613.30 million current US$ | 315.50 million current US$ | 877.91 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 869.32 million current US$ | 716.72 million current US$ | 1.13 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 966.38 million current US$ | 860.66 million current US$ | 1.13 billion current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 9 Tanzania 55.91 million current US$ compare
- 10 Syria 52.92 million current US$ compare
- 11 Moldova 49.29 million current US$ compare
- 12 South Sudan 49.28 million current US$ compare
- 13 Kenya 45.92 million current US$ compare
- 14 Uganda 45.51 million current US$ compare
- 15 Mali 44.50 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 61.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 413.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.20 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 534.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.55 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 362.50 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 860.66 million current US$ in 2022, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 1.13 billion current US$ in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 15.97 million current US$ in 1970.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 12th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.