Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Latvia

Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) was 22.22 % change on previous year in 2004. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2004)
22.22 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 150.8%
World rank
40th
of 142 countries
All-time high
682.76 % change on previous year
in 1997
All-time low
-91.9 % change on previous year
in 1996
Years of data
10
1995–2004

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Latvia, 1995–2004

02004006001995199920041995: -30.5 % change on previous year1996: -91.9 % change on previous year1997: 682.8 % change on previous year1998: 49.8 % change on previous year1999: -19.7 % change on previous year2000: -64.8 % change on previous year2001: -27.1 % change on previous year2002: -77.1 % change on previous year2003: -43.8 % change on previous year2004: 22.2 % change on previous year

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

In 2004, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Latvia stood at 22.22 % change on previous year.

That represents a change of up 150.8% on the previous year and up 172.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Latvia peaked at 682.76 % change on previous year in 1997 and was at its lowest, -91.9 % change on previous year, in 1996.

That places Latvia 40th out of 142 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), annual growth rate in Latvia, 1995 to 2004.
Year % change on previous year Change
1995 -30.49 % change on previous year
1996 -91.9 % change on previous year +201.5%
1997 682.76 % change on previous year -842.9%
1998 49.78 % change on previous year -92.7%
1999 -19.71 % change on previous year -139.6%
2000 -64.84 % change on previous year +229.0%
2001 -27.08 % change on previous year -58.2%
2002 -77.14 % change on previous year +184.8%
2003 -43.75 % change on previous year -43.3%
2004 22.22 % change on previous year -150.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 118.09 % change on previous year -91.9 % change on previous year 682.76 % change on previous year 5
2000s -38.12 % change on previous year -77.14 % change on previous year 22.22 % change on previous year 5

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 37 Tunisia 24.05 % change on previous year compare
  2. 38 Hungary 23.08 % change on previous year compare
  3. 39 Somalia 22.51 % change on previous year compare
  4. 41 Yemen 18.82 % change on previous year compare
  5. 42 Albania 17.58 % change on previous year compare
  6. 43 Lebanon 15.97 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Latvia?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Latvia was 22.22 % change on previous year in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 682.76 % change on previous year in 1997.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was -91.9 % change on previous year in 1996.
How does Latvia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
Latvia ranks 40th out of 142 countries with data for 2004.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 172.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Latvia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-annual-growth-rate/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-switzerland-current-us-annual-growth-rate/latvia/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,828 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.