Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) was 0.5948 current US$ per person in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Zimbabwe, 1969–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Zimbabwe is 0.5948 current US$ per person, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 21.8% on the previous year and down 57.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Zimbabwe peaked at 1.39 current US$ per person in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.0015 current US$ per person, in 1979.
That places Zimbabwe 49th out of 152 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | current US$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 0.002 current US$ per person | — |
| 1972 | 0.0018 current US$ per person | -8.7% |
| 1973 | 0.0035 current US$ per person | +93.8% |
| 1974 | 0.0152 current US$ per person | +335.7% |
| 1975 | 0.0033 current US$ per person | -78.5% |
| 1976 | 0.0175 current US$ per person | +433.5% |
| 1977 | 0.0016 current US$ per person | -91.1% |
| 1978 | 0.0504 current US$ per person | +3152.5% |
| 1979 | 0.0015 current US$ per person | -97.0% |
| 1980 | 0.1733 current US$ per person | +11417.8% |
| 1981 | 0.1574 current US$ per person | -9.2% |
| 1982 | 0.2796 current US$ per person | +77.7% |
| 1983 | 0.3569 current US$ per person | +27.6% |
| 1984 | 0.286 current US$ per person | -19.9% |
| 1985 | 0.2487 current US$ per person | -13.1% |
| 1986 | 0.3863 current US$ per person | +55.4% |
| 1987 | 0.1023 current US$ per person | -73.5% |
| 1988 | 0.1284 current US$ per person | +25.4% |
| 1989 | 0.1642 current US$ per person | +27.9% |
| 1990 | 0.4873 current US$ per person | +196.7% |
| 1991 | 1 current US$ per person | +106.1% |
| 1992 | 0.8839 current US$ per person | -12.0% |
| 1993 | 0.5377 current US$ per person | -39.2% |
| 1994 | 0.848 current US$ per person | +57.7% |
| 1995 | 1.23 current US$ per person | +45.6% |
| 1996 | 0.466 current US$ per person | -62.3% |
| 1997 | 0.0642 current US$ per person | -86.2% |
| 1998 | 0.0552 current US$ per person | -14.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0212 current US$ per person | -61.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0311 current US$ per person | +46.6% |
| 2001 | 0.0284 current US$ per person | -8.7% |
| 2002 | 0.0902 current US$ per person | +217.5% |
| 2003 | 0.0482 current US$ per person | -46.5% |
| 2004 | 0.1197 current US$ per person | +148.1% |
| 2005 | 0.129 current US$ per person | +7.8% |
| 2006 | 0.0704 current US$ per person | -45.4% |
| 2007 | 0.2054 current US$ per person | +191.6% |
| 2008 | 0.4337 current US$ per person | +111.1% |
| 2009 | 0.5296 current US$ per person | +22.1% |
| 2010 | 0.5203 current US$ per person | -1.7% |
| 2011 | 1.03 current US$ per person | +97.2% |
| 2012 | 1.26 current US$ per person | +22.8% |
| 2013 | 1.39 current US$ per person | +10.6% |
| 2014 | 1.07 current US$ per person | -23.2% |
| 2015 | 0.783 current US$ per person | -26.8% |
| 2016 | 0.5263 current US$ per person | -32.8% |
| 2017 | 0.7245 current US$ per person | +37.7% |
| 2018 | 0.8187 current US$ per person | +13.0% |
| 2019 | 0.6423 current US$ per person | -21.5% |
| 2020 | 0.6197 current US$ per person | -3.5% |
| 2021 | 0.7369 current US$ per person | +18.9% |
| 2022 | 0.7608 current US$ per person | +3.2% |
| 2023 | 0.5948 current US$ per person | -21.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.002 current US$ per person | 0.002 current US$ per person | 0.002 current US$ per person | 1 |
| 1970s | 0.0118 current US$ per person | 0.0015 current US$ per person | 0.0504 current US$ per person | 8 |
| 1980s | 0.2283 current US$ per person | 0.1023 current US$ per person | 0.3863 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.5603 current US$ per person | 0.0212 current US$ per person | 1.23 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1686 current US$ per person | 0.0284 current US$ per person | 0.5296 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8765 current US$ per person | 0.5203 current US$ per person | 1.39 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.678 current US$ per person | 0.5948 current US$ per person | 0.7608 current US$ per person | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 46 Sudan 0.7093 current US$ per person compare
- 47 Maldives 0.6528 current US$ per person compare
- 48 Colombia 0.5978 current US$ per person compare
- 50 Cuba 0.565 current US$ per person compare
- 51 Tanzania, United Republic of 0.5203 current US$ per person compare
- 52 Yemen 0.5018 current US$ per person compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zimbabwe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 75,834 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 331,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 9.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 17.35 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.26 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 36.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 575,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Zimbabwe?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Zimbabwe was 0.5948 current US$ per person in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 1.39 current US$ per person in 2013.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0015 current US$ per person in 1979.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Zimbabwe ranks 49th out of 152 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 57.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.