Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific
East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) was 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
5.32 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 5.2%
Rank
40th
of 44 groups
All-time high
8 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific is 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.2% on the previous year and down 29.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 40th of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in East Asia & Pacific, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0004 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0012 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.0033 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.7% |
| 1965 | 0.0045 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0115 current US$ per square kilometre | +154.5% |
| 1967 | 0.0115 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0537 current US$ per square kilometre | +367.9% |
| 1969 | 0.0225 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0279 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.6% |
| 1971 | 0.023 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 1972 | 0.0693 current US$ per square kilometre | +201.8% |
| 1973 | 0.0869 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 1974 | 0.2406 current US$ per square kilometre | +176.9% |
| 1975 | 0.3451 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.4% |
| 1976 | 0.3033 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1977 | 0.1094 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.9% |
| 1978 | 0.1611 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 1979 | 0.2197 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1980 | 0.4611 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.9% |
| 1981 | 0.232 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.7% |
| 1982 | 0.255 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1983 | 0.2898 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 1984 | 0.3915 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 1985 | 0.4534 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1986 | 0.7096 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.5% |
| 1987 | 0.8047 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 1988 | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +147.8% |
| 1989 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 1990 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.1% |
| 1991 | 2.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1992 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1993 | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 1994 | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1995 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.8% |
| 1996 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1997 | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1998 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 1999 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 2000 | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2001 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2002 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.0% |
| 2003 | 2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 2004 | 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2005 | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 2006 | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 2007 | 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2008 | 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 2009 | 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2010 | 3.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 2011 | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.5% |
| 2012 | 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2013 | 7.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.4% |
| 2014 | 7.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 7.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2016 | 8 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2017 | 6.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2018 | 7.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2019 | 6.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 2020 | 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2021 | 7.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2022 | 5.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.6% |
| 2023 | 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0121 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0537 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1586 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.023 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3451 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.7191 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.232 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific
- 37 Cuba 59.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Sri Lanka 59.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Afghanistan 58.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 South Sudan 55.46 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Eswatini 53.06 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Israel 45.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Ghana 45.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in East Asia & Pacific was 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does East Asia & Pacific rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 40th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is down 29.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.