Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) was 52.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Low & middle income stood at 52.84 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 13.7% on the previous year and up 65.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Low & middle income peaked at 52.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0318 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Low & middle income 2nd out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0936 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0318 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0418 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 1964 | 0.0839 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.7% |
| 1965 | 0.1002 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 1966 | 0.157 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.8% |
| 1967 | 0.0932 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.6% |
| 1968 | 0.2174 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.2% |
| 1969 | 0.2497 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1970 | 0.2654 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1971 | 0.278 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1972 | 0.4378 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.5% |
| 1973 | 0.4648 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1974 | 0.6334 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.3% |
| 1975 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.2% |
| 1976 | 0.9589 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1977 | 0.9915 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1978 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.1% |
| 1979 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1980 | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.6% |
| 1981 | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1982 | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1983 | 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1984 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1985 | 3.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1986 | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.3% |
| 1987 | 5.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 1988 | 6.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1989 | 6.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1990 | 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1991 | 10.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 1992 | 9.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 1993 | 8.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1994 | 9.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1995 | 10.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1996 | 9.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1997 | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1998 | 8.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1999 | 9.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2000 | 8.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2001 | 8.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2002 | 10.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 2003 | 12.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 2004 | 15.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 2005 | 18.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 2006 | 16.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 2007 | 16.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2008 | 20.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 2009 | 23.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 2010 | 22.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2011 | 31.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.3% |
| 2012 | 31.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2013 | 32 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2014 | 35.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2015 | 34.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2016 | 35.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2017 | 29.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 2018 | 29.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2019 | 29.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2020 | 36.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 2021 | 37.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2022 | 46.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2023 | 52.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1187 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0318 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2497 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.8143 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2654 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 9.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 15.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 31.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 35.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 43.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 52.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 1 Palestine, State of 19,654 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Naoero 10,081 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Lebanon 2,802 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Malta 1,219 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Republic of Moldova 1,216 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Low & middle income was 52.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 52.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0318 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Low & middle income ranks 2nd out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 65.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.