Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Lower middle income
Lower middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) was 34.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
34.65 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 14.0%
Rank
6th
of 44 groups
All-time high
34.65 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Lower middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Lower middle income recorded 34.65 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 14.0% on the previous year and up 7.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Lower middle income peaked at 34.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Lower middle income 6th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Lower middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0072 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0475 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.0806 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.8% |
| 1965 | 0.1232 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.7% |
| 1966 | 0.1624 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.8% |
| 1967 | 0.1397 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1968 | 0.5379 current US$ per square kilometre | +285.0% |
| 1969 | 0.6031 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1970 | 0.5832 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1971 | 0.6743 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1972 | 0.9118 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.2% |
| 1973 | 0.793 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1974 | 0.8124 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1975 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +186.9% |
| 1976 | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1977 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1978 | 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.5% |
| 1979 | 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1980 | 4.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.8% |
| 1981 | 3.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.9% |
| 1982 | 4.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1983 | 4.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1984 | 5.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1985 | 5.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1986 | 7.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.5% |
| 1987 | 8.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1988 | 8.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1989 | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1990 | 9.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1991 | 16.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.6% |
| 1992 | 13.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 1993 | 10.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1994 | 14.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.9% |
| 1995 | 12.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1996 | 11.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1997 | 10.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1998 | 10.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1999 | 10.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2000 | 8.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 2001 | 8.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2002 | 11.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.9% |
| 2003 | 12.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 2004 | 14.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 2005 | 18.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 2006 | 18.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2007 | 17.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2008 | 15.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2009 | 17.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2010 | 19.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2011 | 26.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 2012 | 27.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2013 | 32.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 2014 | 32.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 34.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2016 | 30.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2017 | 31.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2018 | 30.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2019 | 29.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2020 | 32.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2021 | 34.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2022 | 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 2023 | 34.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1891 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6031 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5832 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 6.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 14.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 29.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 33.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lower middle income
- 3 Lebanon 2,802 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Malta 1,219 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Republic of Moldova 1,216 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Albania 1,069 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Maldives 900 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Haiti 770.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 North Macedonia 751.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Lower middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 83.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 179.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.02 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 654.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.26 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.64 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 725.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 268.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 8.40 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Lower middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Lower middle income was 34.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Lower middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 34.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Lower middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Lower middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Lower middle income ranks 6th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) rising or falling in Lower middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lower middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.