Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) was 11.67 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
11.67 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 6.8%
Rank
29th
of 44 groups
All-time high
12.52 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Upper middle income recorded 11.67 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in 2023.
The figure is down 6.8% on the previous year and up 48.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Upper middle income peaked at 12.52 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Upper middle income 29th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0007 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1963 | 0.03 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.0492 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.2% |
| 1965 | 0.0702 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.6% |
| 1966 | 0.1463 current US$ per square kilometre | +108.5% |
| 1967 | 0.024 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.6% |
| 1968 | 0.0365 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.1% |
| 1969 | 0.0534 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0949 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.6% |
| 1971 | 0.0492 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.2% |
| 1972 | 0.1186 current US$ per square kilometre | +141.1% |
| 1973 | 0.1029 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1974 | 0.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.1% |
| 1975 | 0.2223 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1976 | 0.2647 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 1977 | 0.1948 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 1978 | 0.2685 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.8% |
| 1979 | 0.2645 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1980 | 0.3933 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.7% |
| 1981 | 0.6281 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.7% |
| 1982 | 0.3599 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.7% |
| 1983 | 0.5157 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.3% |
| 1984 | 0.4081 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.9% |
| 1985 | 0.4922 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1986 | 0.6553 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.1% |
| 1987 | 0.936 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.8% |
| 1988 | 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.5% |
| 1989 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1990 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1991 | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.3% |
| 1992 | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1993 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1994 | 2.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1995 | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.6% |
| 1996 | 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1997 | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.3% |
| 1998 | 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1999 | 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.5% |
| 2000 | 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 2001 | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2002 | 3.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2003 | 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.8% |
| 2004 | 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2005 | 8.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.9% |
| 2006 | 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.4% |
| 2007 | 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.3% |
| 2008 | 6.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.2% |
| 2009 | 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 2010 | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2011 | 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 2012 | 6.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2013 | 7.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 2014 | 8.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 2015 | 8.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 2016 | 8.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 7.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2018 | 7.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2019 | 8.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2020 | 8.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2021 | 8.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2022 | 12.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.6% |
| 2023 | 11.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0456 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1463 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.179 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0492 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2685 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.7424 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3599 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 10.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 26 Burkina Faso 149 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 El Salvador 131.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Kyrgyzstan 110.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Cambodia 107.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Bulgaria 100.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Gambia 96.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Honduras 92.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Upper middle income was 11.67 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 12.52 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Upper middle income ranks 29th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 48.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.