Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps in Cuba
Cuba: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps was 92.95 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps in Cuba, 1960–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Cuba is 92.95 million current US$, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 4.0% on the previous year and up 26.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Cuba peaked at 2.29 billion current US$ in 2016 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1967.
Cuba ranks 117th of 180 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps in Cuba, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 20,000 current US$ | — |
| 1961 | 20,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 20,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 20,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 20,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 16,667 current US$ | -16.7% |
| 1966 | 13,333 current US$ | -20.0% |
| 1967 | 10,000 current US$ | -25.0% |
| 1968 | 30,000 current US$ | +200.0% |
| 1969 | 70,000 current US$ | +133.3% |
| 1970 | 110,000 current US$ | +57.1% |
| 1971 | 550,000 current US$ | +400.0% |
| 1972 | 1.54 million current US$ | +180.0% |
| 1973 | 3.07 million current US$ | +99.4% |
| 1974 | 11.59 million current US$ | +277.5% |
| 1975 | 14.26 million current US$ | +23.0% |
| 1976 | 26.01 million current US$ | +82.4% |
| 1977 | 32.60 million current US$ | +25.3% |
| 1978 | 26.54 million current US$ | -18.6% |
| 1979 | 23.91 million current US$ | -9.9% |
| 1980 | 11.06 million current US$ | -53.7% |
| 1981 | 2.63 million current US$ | -76.2% |
| 1982 | 1.51 million current US$ | -42.6% |
| 1983 | 1.91 million current US$ | +26.5% |
| 1984 | 6.44 million current US$ | +237.2% |
| 1985 | 2.47 million current US$ | -61.6% |
| 1986 | 3.72 million current US$ | +50.6% |
| 1987 | 10.02 million current US$ | +169.4% |
| 1988 | 3.81 million current US$ | -62.0% |
| 1989 | 42.85 million current US$ | +1024.7% |
| 1990 | 33.74 million current US$ | -21.3% |
| 1991 | 19.22 million current US$ | -43.0% |
| 1992 | 12.02 million current US$ | -37.5% |
| 1993 | 27.44 million current US$ | +128.3% |
| 1994 | 36.43 million current US$ | +32.8% |
| 1995 | 49.61 million current US$ | +36.2% |
| 1996 | 48.86 million current US$ | -1.5% |
| 1997 | 52.27 million current US$ | +7.0% |
| 1998 | 72.05 million current US$ | +37.8% |
| 1999 | 49.41 million current US$ | -31.4% |
| 2000 | 37.70 million current US$ | -23.7% |
| 2001 | 45.72 million current US$ | +21.3% |
| 2002 | 55.31 million current US$ | +21.0% |
| 2003 | 62.65 million current US$ | +13.3% |
| 2004 | 74.56 million current US$ | +19.0% |
| 2005 | 70.12 million current US$ | -6.0% |
| 2006 | 59.78 million current US$ | -14.7% |
| 2007 | 59.20 million current US$ | -1.0% |
| 2008 | 95.10 million current US$ | +60.6% |
| 2009 | 103.94 million current US$ | +9.3% |
| 2010 | 112.93 million current US$ | +8.6% |
| 2011 | 65.07 million current US$ | -42.4% |
| 2012 | 60.27 million current US$ | -7.4% |
| 2013 | 73.60 million current US$ | +22.1% |
| 2014 | 75.65 million current US$ | +2.8% |
| 2015 | 181.65 million current US$ | +140.1% |
| 2016 | 2.29 billion current US$ | +1160.8% |
| 2017 | 323.30 million current US$ | -85.9% |
| 2018 | 280.66 million current US$ | -13.2% |
| 2019 | 114.97 million current US$ | -59.0% |
| 2020 | 134.07 million current US$ | +16.6% |
| 2021 | 115.03 million current US$ | -14.2% |
| 2022 | 89.41 million current US$ | -22.3% |
| 2023 | 92.95 million current US$ | +4.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 14.02 million current US$ | 110,000 current US$ | 32.60 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 8.64 million current US$ | 1.51 million current US$ | 42.85 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 40.10 million current US$ | 12.02 million current US$ | 72.05 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 66.41 million current US$ | 37.70 million current US$ | 103.94 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 357.83 million current US$ | 60.27 million current US$ | 2.29 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 107.87 million current US$ | 89.41 million current US$ | 134.07 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More aid effectiveness data for Cuba
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 142,165 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 582,429 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 16.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 6.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 18.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 550,653 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.00 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Cuba?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Cuba was 92.95 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 2.29 billion current US$ in 2016.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1967.
- How does Cuba rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
- Cuba ranks 117th out of 180 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 26.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.