Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps in Philippines
Philippines: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps was 1.74 billion current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps in Philippines, 1960–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Philippines stood at 1.74 billion current US$. That is the highest value across all 64 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 13.2% on the previous year and up 653.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Philippines peaked at 1.74 billion current US$ in 2023 and was at its lowest, -175.56 million current US$, in 2011.
Philippines ranks 12th of 180 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps in Philippines, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 50.93 million current US$ | — |
| 1961 | 19.06 million current US$ | -62.6% |
| 1962 | 30.34 million current US$ | +59.2% |
| 1963 | 21.61 million current US$ | -28.8% |
| 1964 | 72.34 million current US$ | +234.8% |
| 1965 | 90.87 million current US$ | +25.6% |
| 1966 | 42.41 million current US$ | -53.3% |
| 1967 | 83.35 million current US$ | +96.5% |
| 1968 | 62.15 million current US$ | -25.4% |
| 1969 | 76.03 million current US$ | +22.3% |
| 1970 | 41.31 million current US$ | -45.7% |
| 1971 | 64.21 million current US$ | +55.4% |
| 1972 | 156.67 million current US$ | +144.0% |
| 1973 | 213.84 million current US$ | +36.5% |
| 1974 | 134.44 million current US$ | -37.1% |
| 1975 | 160.94 million current US$ | +19.7% |
| 1976 | 162.56 million current US$ | +1.0% |
| 1977 | 145.96 million current US$ | -10.2% |
| 1978 | 166.11 million current US$ | +13.8% |
| 1979 | 178.24 million current US$ | +7.3% |
| 1980 | 206.42 million current US$ | +15.8% |
| 1981 | 333.39 million current US$ | +61.5% |
| 1982 | 280.97 million current US$ | -15.7% |
| 1983 | 362.21 million current US$ | +28.9% |
| 1984 | 357.65 million current US$ | -1.3% |
| 1985 | 441.06 million current US$ | +23.3% |
| 1986 | 890.38 million current US$ | +101.9% |
| 1987 | 706.05 million current US$ | -20.7% |
| 1988 | 794.91 million current US$ | +12.6% |
| 1989 | 764.91 million current US$ | -3.8% |
| 1990 | 1.11 billion current US$ | +45.5% |
| 1991 | 878.33 million current US$ | -21.1% |
| 1992 | 1.56 billion current US$ | +77.1% |
| 1993 | 1.35 billion current US$ | -13.3% |
| 1994 | 963.24 million current US$ | -28.6% |
| 1995 | 806.72 million current US$ | -16.2% |
| 1996 | 799.03 million current US$ | -1.0% |
| 1997 | 595.95 million current US$ | -25.4% |
| 1998 | 549.78 million current US$ | -7.7% |
| 1999 | 640.61 million current US$ | +16.5% |
| 2000 | 532.68 million current US$ | -16.8% |
| 2001 | 530.52 million current US$ | -0.4% |
| 2002 | 536.14 million current US$ | +1.1% |
| 2003 | 699.08 million current US$ | +30.4% |
| 2004 | 439.11 million current US$ | -37.2% |
| 2005 | 554.11 million current US$ | +26.2% |
| 2006 | 547.24 million current US$ | -1.2% |
| 2007 | 573.46 million current US$ | +4.8% |
| 2008 | 40.32 million current US$ | -93.0% |
| 2009 | 295.69 million current US$ | +633.4% |
| 2010 | 504.06 million current US$ | +70.5% |
| 2011 | -175.56 million current US$ | -134.8% |
| 2012 | 3.98 million current US$ | -102.3% |
| 2013 | 230.67 million current US$ | +5701.3% |
| 2014 | 702.13 million current US$ | +204.4% |
| 2015 | 544.25 million current US$ | -22.5% |
| 2016 | 311.10 million current US$ | -42.8% |
| 2017 | 191.56 million current US$ | -38.4% |
| 2018 | 499.79 million current US$ | +160.9% |
| 2019 | 857.86 million current US$ | +71.6% |
| 2020 | 1.40 billion current US$ | +63.5% |
| 2021 | 1.58 billion current US$ | +13.0% |
| 2022 | 1.53 billion current US$ | -3.2% |
| 2023 | 1.74 billion current US$ | +13.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 54.91 million current US$ | 19.06 million current US$ | 90.87 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 142.43 million current US$ | 41.31 million current US$ | 213.84 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 513.79 million current US$ | 206.42 million current US$ | 890.38 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 925.02 million current US$ | 549.78 million current US$ | 1.56 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 474.83 million current US$ | 40.32 million current US$ | 699.08 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 366.98 million current US$ | -175.56 million current US$ | 857.86 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.56 billion current US$ | 1.40 billion current US$ | 1.74 billion current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
More aid effectiveness data for Philippines
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 3.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 74.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 56.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 953,487 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 153.71 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -19,124 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.00 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Philippines?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps in Philippines was 1.74 billion current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 1.74 billion current US$ in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was -175.56 million current US$ in 2011.
- How does Philippines rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps?
- Philippines ranks 12th out of 180 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is up 653.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.