Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in High income
High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 8.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in High income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
High income recorded 8.9 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of up 22.6% on the previous year and up 78.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in High income peaked at 90.58 current US$ per square kilometre in 1986 and was at its lowest, 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2015.
That places High income 42nd out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in High income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 18.18 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 17.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1963 | 18.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1964 | 13.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.8% |
| 1965 | 17 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 1966 | 16.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1967 | 16.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1968 | 15.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1969 | 17.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1970 | 17.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1971 | 18.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1972 | 21.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1973 | 22.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1974 | 18.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 1975 | 32.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.1% |
| 1976 | 34.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1977 | 40.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 1978 | 44.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1979 | 53.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 1980 | 49.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1981 | 52.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1982 | 47.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1983 | 66.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.5% |
| 1984 | 62.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1985 | 86.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.1% |
| 1986 | 90.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1987 | 77.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 1988 | 71.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1989 | 74.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1990 | 81.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1991 | 90.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1992 | 68.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 1993 | 54.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 1994 | 55.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1995 | 41.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.3% |
| 1996 | 73.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.8% |
| 1997 | 26.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.7% |
| 1998 | 25.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1999 | 21.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 2000 | 7.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.5% |
| 2001 | 8.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.3% |
| 2002 | 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 2003 | 7.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2004 | 7.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2005 | 8.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2006 | 9.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 2007 | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.2% |
| 2008 | 13.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +198.1% |
| 2009 | 12.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2010 | 15.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 2011 | 9.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.4% |
| 2012 | 6.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 2013 | 4.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 2014 | 6.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 2015 | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.7% |
| 2016 | 6.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.7% |
| 2017 | 4.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 2018 | 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2019 | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 2020 | 5.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 2021 | 4.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2022 | 7.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.4% |
| 2023 | 8.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 30.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 67.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 90.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 53.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 90.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near High income
- 39 Bermuda 9,074 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Malawi 9,053 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Fiji 9,040 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Cape Verde 8,427 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Georgia 7,483 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Armenia 7,432 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Bosnia and Herzegovina 7,287 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for High income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 327,620 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 0 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.06 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 233,494 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 7.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 61.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 277,565 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 902,924 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 213.34 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in High income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in High income was 8.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in High income?
- The highest recorded value was 90.58 current US$ per square kilometre in 1986.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in High income?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015.
- How does High income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- High income ranks 42nd out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in High income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 78.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this High income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.