Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Republic of Korea
Republic of Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 10.54 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Republic of Korea, 1961–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Republic of Korea recorded 10.54 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in 2004.
The figure is up 499.9% on the previous year and up 101.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Republic of Korea peaked at 3,644 current US$ per square kilometre in 1972 and was at its lowest, -1,640 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1997.
That places Republic of Korea 169th out of 178 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Republic of Korea, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 2,379 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 2,444 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1963 | 2,581 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1964 | 1,748 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.3% |
| 1965 | 2,261 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.4% |
| 1966 | 2,160 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1967 | 2,665 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 1968 | 2,427 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1969 | 3,403 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.2% |
| 1970 | 2,779 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 1971 | 3,165 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1972 | 3,644 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1973 | 2,725 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 1974 | 2,288 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 1975 | 2,211 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1976 | 1,878 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 1977 | 1,780 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1978 | 1,414 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1979 | 1,037 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.6% |
| 1980 | 1,216 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1981 | 3,378 current US$ per square kilometre | +177.8% |
| 1982 | 159.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.3% |
| 1983 | 102.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.9% |
| 1984 | -361.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -452.7% |
| 1985 | -79.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.0% |
| 1986 | -243.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +206.3% |
| 1987 | 16.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -106.7% |
| 1988 | 96.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +488.6% |
| 1989 | 507.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +426.8% |
| 1990 | 569.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1991 | 544.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1992 | 31.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.2% |
| 1993 | -360.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -1235.9% |
| 1994 | -1,109 current US$ per square kilometre | +207.9% |
| 1995 | 627.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -156.5% |
| 1996 | -1,540 current US$ per square kilometre | -345.6% |
| 1997 | -1,640 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1998 | -508.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.0% |
| 1999 | -557.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2000 | 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2003 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +1594.0% |
| 2004 | 10.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +499.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,452 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,748 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,403 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 2,292 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,037 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,644 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 479.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -361.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,378 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | -394.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -1,640 current US$ per square kilometre | 627.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Republic of Korea
- 166 Turkmenistan 15.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 167 Kazakhstan 12.82 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 168 Argentina 10.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 170 Brunei Darussalam 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 171 Kuwait 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 172 French Polynesia 5.76 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Republic of Korea
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 1.74 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 770,000 current US$ (1998)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 50,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.76 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 9.74 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 240,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.65 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -49.52 million current US$ (1999)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Republic of Korea?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Republic of Korea was 10.54 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Republic of Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 3,644 current US$ per square kilometre in 1972.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Republic of Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was -1,640 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- How does Republic of Korea rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Republic of Korea ranks 169th out of 178 countries with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Republic of Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 101.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Republic of Korea data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.