Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 2,541 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Low & middle income is 2,541 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 6.3% on the previous year and up 85.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Low & middle income peaked at 2,541 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 65.92 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Low & middle income 6th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 65.92 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 67.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1963 | 71.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1964 | 71.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1965 | 74.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1966 | 72.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1967 | 77.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1968 | 71.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1969 | 68.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1970 | 79.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1971 | 89.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1972 | 92.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1973 | 99.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1974 | 118.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1975 | 140.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1976 | 131.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1977 | 140.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1978 | 186.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 1979 | 235.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 1980 | 257.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1981 | 266.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1982 | 267.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1983 | 267.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1984 | 285.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1985 | 313.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1986 | 375.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1987 | 432.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1988 | 484.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1989 | 499.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1990 | 577.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1991 | 658.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1992 | 618.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1993 | 560.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1994 | 591.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1995 | 589.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1996 | 581.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1997 | 490.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1998 | 527.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1999 | 561.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2000 | 529.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2001 | 532.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2002 | 601.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2003 | 730.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 2004 | 812.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2005 | 1,195 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 2006 | 1,135 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2007 | 1,102 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2008 | 1,287 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 2009 | 1,253 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2010 | 1,331 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2011 | 1,446 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2012 | 1,322 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2013 | 1,367 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2014 | 1,394 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2015 | 1,350 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2016 | 1,502 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2017 | 1,523 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2018 | 1,527 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2019 | 1,479 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2020 | 1,696 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2021 | 1,879 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2022 | 2,391 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 2023 | 2,541 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 71.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 65.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 77.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 131.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 79.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 235.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 344.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 257.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 499.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 575.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 490.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 658.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 917.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 529.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,287 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,424 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,322 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,527 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2,127 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,696 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,541 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 3 Marshall Islands 574,467 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Palestine 274,548 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Micronesia (country) 164,397 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Tonga 151,054 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Lebanon 139,871 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Kiribati 91,407 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Ukraine 66,866 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Low & middle income was 2,541 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 2,541 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 65.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Low & middle income ranks 6th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 85.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.