Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Middle income
Middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 1,459 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1,459 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 17.4%
Rank
18th
of 44 groups
All-time high
1,459 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
61.22 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Middle income stood at 1,459 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 17.4% on the previous year and up 82.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Middle income peaked at 1,459 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 61.22 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Middle income 18th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 63.33 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 61.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1963 | 65.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1964 | 67.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1965 | 70.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1966 | 70.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1967 | 73.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1968 | 70.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1969 | 65.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1970 | 68.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1971 | 74.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1972 | 74.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1973 | 79.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1974 | 97.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1975 | 111.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1976 | 100.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1977 | 104.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1978 | 143.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 1979 | 175.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 1980 | 192.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1981 | 200.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1982 | 200.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1983 | 195.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1984 | 206.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1985 | 209.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1986 | 263.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 1987 | 301.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1988 | 341.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1989 | 358.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1990 | 425.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1991 | 499.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1992 | 451.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1993 | 416.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1994 | 437.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1995 | 436.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1996 | 402.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1997 | 337.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1998 | 380.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1999 | 422.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2000 | 383.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2001 | 395.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2002 | 427.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2003 | 458.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2004 | 529.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2005 | 952.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.9% |
| 2006 | 833.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2007 | 715.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 2008 | 798.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2009 | 725.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2010 | 739.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2011 | 809.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2012 | 773.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 2013 | 798.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2014 | 755.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2015 | 689.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2016 | 770.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2017 | 765.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2018 | 764.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2019 | 704.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2020 | 889.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 2021 | 927.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2022 | 1,243 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 2023 | 1,459 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 67.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 73.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 102.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 68.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 175.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 247.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 192.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 358.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 420.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 337.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 499.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 622.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 383.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 952.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 757.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 689.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 809.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,130 current US$ per square kilometre | 889.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,459 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle income
- 15 Malta 34,844 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Barbados 34,419 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Samoa 34,127 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Comoros 29,668 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Seychelles 28,657 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Republic of Moldova 28,134 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Bangladesh 26,367 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 373.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 293.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.42 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 6.29 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.17 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 463.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.26 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Middle income was 1,459 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 1,459 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 61.22 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Middle income ranks 18th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 82.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.