Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Namibia
Namibia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 296.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Namibia, 1972–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Namibia stood at 296.39 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 48.3% on the previous year and up 5.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Namibia peaked at 342.2 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.0121 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1983.
That places Namibia 140th out of 178 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Namibia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 0.0243 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0.0121 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1985 | 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +32199.9% |
| 1986 | 14.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +264.7% |
| 1987 | 20.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.3% |
| 1988 | 22.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1989 | 48.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.2% |
| 1990 | 132.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +174.9% |
| 1991 | 206.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.8% |
| 1992 | 153.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.8% |
| 1993 | 163.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1994 | 148.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1995 | 208.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.6% |
| 1996 | 210.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1997 | 188.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 1998 | 207.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1999 | 200.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2000 | 173.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2001 | 127.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.8% |
| 2002 | 150.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 2003 | 165.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2004 | 170.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2005 | 115.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.3% |
| 2006 | 137.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 2007 | 210.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.2% |
| 2008 | 218.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2009 | 342.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.3% |
| 2010 | 272.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.4% |
| 2011 | 312.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2012 | 252.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 2013 | 280.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2014 | 243.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 2015 | 154.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.6% |
| 2016 | 168.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2017 | 153.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2018 | 148.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2019 | 140.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2020 | 183.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.7% |
| 2021 | 189.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2022 | 199.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2023 | 296.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0243 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0243 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0243 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1980s | 18.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0121 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 1990s | 182.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 132.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 210.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 181.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 115.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 342.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 212.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 140.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 312.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 217.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 183.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 296.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Namibia
- 137 Macau, China 370.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 138 Chad 361.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 139 Botswana 313.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 141 Bahamas 281.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 142 Equatorial Guinea 251.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 143 Paraguay 248.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Namibia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 85,039 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 42,593 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 124,059 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 15.16 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 435,873 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 134.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 634,719 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 356,106 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 18,973 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 6.26 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Namibia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Namibia was 296.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Namibia?
- The highest recorded value was 342.2 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Namibia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0121 current US$ per square kilometre in 1983.
- How does Namibia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Namibia ranks 140th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Namibia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Namibia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 41 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.