Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) in Hong Kong
Hong Kong: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) was 30,000 current US$ in 2000. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total in Hong Kong, 1960–2000
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2000, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total in Hong Kong stood at 30,000 current US$.
That represents a change of down 99.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total in Hong Kong peaked at 22.45 million current US$ in 1990 and was at its lowest, -58.05 million current US$, in 1992.
Hong Kong ranks 170th of 181 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) in Hong Kong, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 5.83 million current US$ | — |
| 1961 | 4.92 million current US$ | -15.6% |
| 1962 | 1.82 million current US$ | -63.0% |
| 1963 | 5.19 million current US$ | +185.2% |
| 1964 | -0.0019 current US$ | -100.0% |
| 1965 | 4.22 million current US$ | -226558934950.9% |
| 1966 | 2.44 million current US$ | -42.2% |
| 1967 | 2.62 million current US$ | +7.4% |
| 1968 | 1.27 million current US$ | -51.5% |
| 1969 | 1.17 million current US$ | -7.9% |
| 1970 | 1.29 million current US$ | +10.3% |
| 1971 | 3.51 million current US$ | +172.1% |
| 1972 | 2.79 million current US$ | -20.5% |
| 1973 | 780,000 current US$ | -72.0% |
| 1974 | 820,000 current US$ | +5.1% |
| 1975 | -1.35 million current US$ | -264.6% |
| 1976 | 2.49 million current US$ | -284.4% |
| 1977 | 2.01 million current US$ | -19.3% |
| 1978 | 2.09 million current US$ | +4.0% |
| 1979 | 3.24 million current US$ | +55.0% |
| 1980 | 3.64 million current US$ | +12.3% |
| 1981 | 3.57 million current US$ | -1.9% |
| 1982 | 3.67 million current US$ | +2.8% |
| 1983 | 4.66 million current US$ | +27.0% |
| 1984 | 9.27 million current US$ | +98.9% |
| 1985 | 16.72 million current US$ | +80.4% |
| 1986 | 14.06 million current US$ | -15.9% |
| 1987 | 14.99 million current US$ | +6.6% |
| 1988 | 13.57 million current US$ | -9.5% |
| 1989 | 14.09 million current US$ | +3.8% |
| 1990 | 22.45 million current US$ | +59.3% |
| 1991 | 15.40 million current US$ | -31.4% |
| 1992 | -58.05 million current US$ | -476.9% |
| 1993 | 12.91 million current US$ | -122.2% |
| 1994 | 12.18 million current US$ | -5.7% |
| 1995 | 14.09 million current US$ | +15.7% |
| 1996 | 10.94 million current US$ | -22.4% |
| 1997 | 30,000 current US$ | -99.7% |
| 2000 | 30,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
Hong Kong compared with similar countries
- Hong Kong's 30,000 current US$ is below the median for high income countries, which is 14.52 million current US$, 0% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Hong Kong's 30,000 current US$ is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 99.14 million current US$, 0% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) in Hong Kong changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1965 | +226558934950.9% | -0.0019 current US$ | 4.22 million current US$ |
| 1992 | -476.9% | 15.40 million current US$ | -58.05 million current US$ |
| 1976 | +284.4% | -1.35 million current US$ | 2.49 million current US$ |
| 1975 | -264.6% | 820,000 current US$ | -1.35 million current US$ |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.95 million current US$ | -0.0019 current US$ | 5.83 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.77 million current US$ | -1.35 million current US$ | 3.51 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.82 million current US$ | 3.57 million current US$ | 16.72 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.74 million current US$ | -58.05 million current US$ | 22.45 million current US$ | 8 |
| 2000s | 30,000 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | 1 |
Countries ranked near Hong Kong
More aid effectiveness data for Hong Kong
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 70,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10,000 current US$ (1992)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 800,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 30,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.57 million current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.06 million current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 120,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 50,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.86 million current US$ (1996)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total in Hong Kong?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total in Hong Kong was 30,000 current US$ in 2000, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total recorded in Hong Kong?
- The highest recorded value was 22.45 million current US$ in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total recorded in Hong Kong?
- The lowest recorded value was -58.05 million current US$ in 1992.
- How does Hong Kong rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total?
- Hong Kong ranks 170th out of 181 countries with data for 2000.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total rising or falling in Hong Kong?
- Over the last ten years it is down 99.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hong Kong data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 39 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.