Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Guatemala
Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 0.0665 current US$ per person in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Guatemala, 1966–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Guatemala is 0.0665 current US$ per person, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 24.9% on the previous year and down 98.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Guatemala peaked at 5.01 current US$ per person in 2013 and was at its lowest, -2.02 current US$ per person, in 2007.
Guatemala ranks 112th of 169 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | current US$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 0.0021 current US$ per person | — |
| 1967 | 0.01 current US$ per person | +386.2% |
| 1969 | 0.0019 current US$ per person | -81.1% |
| 1970 | 0.0037 current US$ per person | +94.8% |
| 1973 | 0.0069 current US$ per person | +85.1% |
| 1974 | 0.0033 current US$ per person | -51.3% |
| 1975 | 0.0049 current US$ per person | +46.4% |
| 1976 | 0.0735 current US$ per person | +1400.6% |
| 1977 | 0.0016 current US$ per person | -97.9% |
| 1978 | 0.0107 current US$ per person | +582.9% |
| 1979 | 0.0045 current US$ per person | -58.2% |
| 1980 | 0.0116 current US$ per person | +160.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0042 current US$ per person | -63.4% |
| 1982 | 0.0014 current US$ per person | -67.4% |
| 1985 | 0.0013 current US$ per person | -7.8% |
| 1986 | 0.0012 current US$ per person | -2.7% |
| 1988 | 0.0012 current US$ per person | -5.4% |
| 1989 | 0.0046 current US$ per person | +288.9% |
| 1990 | 0.0166 current US$ per person | +264.6% |
| 1991 | 0.0162 current US$ per person | -2.7% |
| 1992 | 0.0147 current US$ per person | -9.1% |
| 1993 | 0.0419 current US$ per person | +185.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0149 current US$ per person | -64.4% |
| 1995 | 0.0281 current US$ per person | +88.3% |
| 1996 | 0.0652 current US$ per person | +131.9% |
| 1997 | 0.0774 current US$ per person | +18.7% |
| 1998 | 0.0359 current US$ per person | -53.6% |
| 1999 | 0.1716 current US$ per person | +377.8% |
| 2000 | 1.99 current US$ per person | +1056.9% |
| 2001 | 0.0485 current US$ per person | -97.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0465 current US$ per person | -4.0% |
| 2003 | 0.012 current US$ per person | -74.3% |
| 2004 | -0.0242 current US$ per person | -302.1% |
| 2005 | 0.0053 current US$ per person | -122.1% |
| 2006 | -0.3486 current US$ per person | -6617.8% |
| 2007 | -2.02 current US$ per person | +480.1% |
| 2008 | 0.0474 current US$ per person | -102.3% |
| 2009 | 0.0506 current US$ per person | +6.9% |
| 2010 | 0.0159 current US$ per person | -68.7% |
| 2011 | 0.0061 current US$ per person | -61.6% |
| 2012 | 0.9954 current US$ per person | +16259.9% |
| 2013 | 5.01 current US$ per person | +403.0% |
| 2014 | 0.1131 current US$ per person | -97.7% |
| 2015 | 0.1021 current US$ per person | -9.7% |
| 2016 | 0.0913 current US$ per person | -10.7% |
| 2017 | 0.0749 current US$ per person | -18.0% |
| 2018 | 0.1782 current US$ per person | +138.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0913 current US$ per person | -48.8% |
| 2020 | 0.0649 current US$ per person | -29.0% |
| 2021 | 0.1379 current US$ per person | +112.6% |
| 2022 | 0.0886 current US$ per person | -35.7% |
| 2023 | 0.0665 current US$ per person | -24.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0047 current US$ per person | 0.0019 current US$ per person | 0.01 current US$ per person | 3 |
| 1970s | 0.0136 current US$ per person | 0.0016 current US$ per person | 0.0735 current US$ per person | 8 |
| 1980s | 0.0036 current US$ per person | 0.0012 current US$ per person | 0.0116 current US$ per person | 7 |
| 1990s | 0.0483 current US$ per person | 0.0147 current US$ per person | 0.1716 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.02 current US$ per person | -2.02 current US$ per person | 1.99 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6675 current US$ per person | 0.0061 current US$ per person | 5.01 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0895 current US$ per person | 0.0649 current US$ per person | 0.1379 current US$ per person | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 109 Indonesia 0.0719 current US$ per person compare
- 110 Cape Verde 0.0714 current US$ per person compare
- 111 Morocco 0.0692 current US$ per person compare
- 113 Timor-Leste 0.0626 current US$ per person compare
- 114 Panama 0.0623 current US$ per person compare
- 115 Thailand 0.0578 current US$ per person compare
More aid effectiveness data for Guatemala
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 27.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 4.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -158,126 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Guatemala?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Guatemala was 0.0665 current US$ per person in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 5.01 current US$ per person in 2013.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.02 current US$ per person in 2007.
- How does Guatemala rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Guatemala ranks 112th out of 169 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is down 98.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.