Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in China
China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 0.9357 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in China, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
China recorded 0.9357 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in 2023.
That represents a change of down 52.3% on the previous year and up 131.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in China peaked at 18.63 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, -5.89 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2014.
That places China 136th out of 168 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in China, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 0.0096 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0.0288 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0266 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1983 | 0.0309 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0799 current US$ per square kilometre | +158.6% |
| 1985 | 0.1662 current US$ per square kilometre | +108.0% |
| 1986 | 0.3419 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.8% |
| 1987 | 0.5102 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 1988 | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +788.1% |
| 1989 | 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.0% |
| 1990 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1991 | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1992 | 6.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.5% |
| 1993 | 4.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 1994 | 5.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1995 | 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1996 | 6.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1997 | 4.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 1998 | 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 1999 | 6.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2000 | 8.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.8% |
| 2001 | 5.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.2% |
| 2002 | 3.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 2003 | 5.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 2004 | 7.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.2% |
| 2005 | 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 2006 | 5.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2007 | 17.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +210.7% |
| 2008 | 18.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2009 | 12.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 2010 | 9.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 2011 | 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 2012 | 4.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.5% |
| 2013 | -2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -165.1% |
| 2014 | -5.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +96.9% |
| 2015 | 7.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -223.3% |
| 2016 | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2017 | 6.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2018 | 7.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 2019 | 9.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 2020 | 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2021 | 7.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2022 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.1% |
| 2023 | 0.9357 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.8578 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0096 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 9.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9357 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
- 133 Cambodia 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 134 Guyana 0.9604 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Equatorial Guinea 0.9508 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 137 Burundi 0.9168 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 138 Burkina Faso 0.7662 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 139 Peru 0.7503 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 100,022 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada -11.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 216.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -48.60 million current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -8.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -521.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in China was 0.9357 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 18.63 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was -5.89 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014.
- How does China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- China ranks 136th out of 168 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 131.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.