Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 70.43 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) is 70.43 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.8% on the previous year and up 444.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) peaked at 86.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 2002 and was at its lowest, -7.38 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1989.
That places Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) 9th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | -4.84 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -179.0% |
| 1963 | 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.4% |
| 1964 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.3% |
| 1965 | 14.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +1025.5% |
| 1966 | 13.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1967 | 13.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1968 | 13.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1969 | 7.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.1% |
| 1970 | 16.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +119.8% |
| 1971 | 17.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1972 | 19.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1973 | 4.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.1% |
| 1974 | 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.7% |
| 1975 | 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1976 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.3% |
| 1977 | 9.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +555.0% |
| 1978 | 4.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.3% |
| 1979 | 3.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 1980 | 39.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +1033.7% |
| 1981 | 69.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.8% |
| 1982 | 35.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.5% |
| 1983 | 10.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.6% |
| 1984 | 9.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1985 | 46.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +381.3% |
| 1986 | 25.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.1% |
| 1987 | 16.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.6% |
| 1988 | 6.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.7% |
| 1989 | -7.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -213.1% |
| 1990 | -7.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1991 | 23.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -433.3% |
| 1992 | 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.6% |
| 1993 | 20.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +744.6% |
| 1994 | 23.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1995 | 10.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.8% |
| 1996 | 16.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.8% |
| 1997 | 13.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 1998 | 8.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 1999 | 13.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.4% |
| 2000 | 27.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.8% |
| 2001 | 11.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.7% |
| 2002 | 86.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +636.1% |
| 2003 | 9.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.8% |
| 2004 | 9.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2005 | 25.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +179.3% |
| 2006 | 40.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.8% |
| 2007 | 14.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.3% |
| 2008 | 15.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2009 | 12.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 2010 | 12.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2011 | 11.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2012 | 15.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 2013 | 12.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2014 | 17.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 2015 | 21.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 2016 | 34.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.6% |
| 2017 | 40.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 2018 | 30.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 2019 | 31.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2020 | 27.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2021 | 28.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2022 | 84.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +199.4% |
| 2023 | 70.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 8.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 25.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 25.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 86.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 22.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 52.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 84.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- 6 Kiribati 1,563 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Gambia 1,542 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Bermuda 1,296 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Seychelles 946.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Rwanda 919.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Syrian Arab Republic 741.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Republic of Moldova 596.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
All data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) was 70.43 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 86.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 2002.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -7.38 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 9th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 444.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.