Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Mexico
Mexico: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2.79 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 34.5%
World rank
117th
of 168 countries
All-time high
30.92 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1982
All-time low
-4.97 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
Years of data
59
1964–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Mexico, 1964–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Mexico recorded 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 34.5% on the previous year and down 39.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Mexico peaked at 30.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 1982 and was at its lowest, -4.97 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2005.
That places Mexico 117th out of 168 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Mexico, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 0.0103 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.0309 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1966 | 0.1029 current US$ per square kilometre | +233.3% |
| 1967 | 0.0463 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0669 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.4% |
| 1969 | 0.0926 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.5% |
| 1970 | 0.1235 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1971 | 0.0977 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.8% |
| 1972 | 0.1698 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.7% |
| 1973 | 0.3652 current US$ per square kilometre | +115.2% |
| 1974 | 0.4887 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.8% |
| 1975 | 0.8385 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.6% |
| 1976 | 0.5864 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.1% |
| 1977 | 0.7613 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 1978 | 0.8179 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1979 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.5% |
| 1980 | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.6% |
| 1981 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 1982 | 30.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +1923.6% |
| 1983 | 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.9% |
| 1984 | 0.3549 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.9% |
| 1985 | 0.5144 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.9% |
| 1986 | 0.607 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1987 | 0.5298 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1988 | 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +116.5% |
| 1989 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1990 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1991 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 1992 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 1993 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1994 | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.9% |
| 1995 | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 1996 | 2.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1997 | 2.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1998 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 1999 | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 2000 | 2.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2001 | 0.6687 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.0% |
| 2002 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2003 | -1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -240.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0772 current US$ per square kilometre | -104.1% |
| 2005 | -4.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -6546.7% |
| 2007 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -123.8% |
| 2008 | 3.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +193.5% |
| 2009 | 5.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.4% |
| 2010 | 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 2011 | 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.8% |
| 2012 | 3.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2013 | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.0% |
| 2014 | -0.8119 current US$ per square kilometre | -117.6% |
| 2015 | 10.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -1351.4% |
| 2016 | 7.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 2017 | 8.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2018 | 11.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 2019 | 15.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 2020 | 23.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.5% |
| 2021 | 14.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 2022 | 4.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.5% |
| 2023 | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0583 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0103 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1029 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 1970s | 0.5545 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0977 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3549 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9768 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2010s | 6.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8119 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 11.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 114 Lesotho 3.06 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 Oman 3 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 116 Chad 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 118 Guinea-Bissau 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 Republic of Korea 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 120 Papua New Guinea 2.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Mexico
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 6.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,627 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 8.90 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions -75.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 83.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 132.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 5.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.81 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Mexico?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Mexico was 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 30.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 1982.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was -4.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- How does Mexico rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Mexico ranks 117th out of 168 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is down 39.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.