Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Philippines
Philippines: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 29.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
29.57 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 11.6%
World rank
66th
of 168 countries
All-time high
309.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2014
All-time low
-93.37 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2003
Years of data
62
1962–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Philippines, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Philippines recorded 29.57 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in 2023.
The figure is down 11.6% on the previous year and down 83.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Philippines peaked at 309.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, -93.37 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2003.
That places Philippines 66th out of 168 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Philippines, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0.4023 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.5029 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1964 | 0.6706 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1965 | 0.637 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1966 | 0.9723 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.6% |
| 1967 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1968 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1969 | 0.9723 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1970 | 0.6035 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.9% |
| 1971 | 0.8717 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.4% |
| 1972 | 0.9388 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1973 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1974 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.4% |
| 1975 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 1976 | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 1977 | 0.9726 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 1978 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.8% |
| 1979 | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.6% |
| 1980 | 17.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +725.8% |
| 1981 | 15.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1982 | 5.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.2% |
| 1983 | 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 1984 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.9% |
| 1985 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.2% |
| 1986 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.1% |
| 1987 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.3% |
| 1988 | 6.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +332.6% |
| 1989 | 65.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +950.0% |
| 1990 | 30.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.9% |
| 1991 | 15.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.9% |
| 1992 | 42.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +171.6% |
| 1993 | 33.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 1994 | 43.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1995 | 18.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.4% |
| 1996 | 33.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.0% |
| 1997 | 62.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.7% |
| 1998 | 16.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.0% |
| 1999 | 7.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.7% |
| 2000 | 10.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.5% |
| 2001 | 20.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.5% |
| 2002 | 4.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.6% |
| 2003 | -93.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -2275.0% |
| 2004 | -65.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 2005 | 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -132.5% |
| 2006 | 2.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.2% |
| 2007 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 2008 | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +141.8% |
| 2009 | 14.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +230.1% |
| 2010 | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.8% |
| 2011 | 6.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +256.9% |
| 2012 | 8.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.5% |
| 2013 | 183.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +1977.0% |
| 2014 | 309.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.2% |
| 2015 | 46.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.9% |
| 2016 | 25.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.1% |
| 2017 | 32.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 2018 | 45.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.3% |
| 2019 | 58.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 2020 | 82.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.5% |
| 2021 | 63.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 2022 | 33.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.0% |
| 2023 | 29.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8047 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4023 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6035 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 11.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 65.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 30.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 62.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -7.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 71.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 309.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 52.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 82.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
- 63 Viet Nam 30.63 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 64 Liberia 30.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 65 Serbia 29.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 67 Tunisia 28.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 68 Bulgaria 27.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 69 Solomon Islands 25.38 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Philippines
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 3.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 74.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 56.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 953,487 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 153.71 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -19,124 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.00 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Philippines?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Philippines was 29.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 309.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was -93.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003.
- How does Philippines rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Philippines ranks 66th out of 168 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 83.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.