Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 13.69 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
13.69 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 15.5%
Rank
33rd
of 45 groups
All-time high
37.23 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
-1.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Upper middle income recorded 13.69 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in 2023.
That represents a change of down 15.5% on the previous year and up 101.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Upper middle income peaked at 37.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, -1.73 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2007.
That places Upper middle income 33rd out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1963 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 1964 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 1965 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1966 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1967 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1968 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1969 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 1970 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1971 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.7% |
| 1972 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1973 | 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 1974 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 1975 | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1976 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 1977 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1978 | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.7% |
| 1979 | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1980 | 3.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.2% |
| 1981 | 3.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1982 | 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.1% |
| 1983 | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.4% |
| 1984 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.4% |
| 1985 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.5% |
| 1986 | 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.4% |
| 1987 | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.8% |
| 1988 | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.1% |
| 1989 | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1990 | 3.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1991 | 5.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.6% |
| 1992 | 4.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 1993 | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.7% |
| 1994 | 5.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1995 | 4.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 1996 | 4.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1997 | 5.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1998 | 5.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1999 | 8.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.7% |
| 2000 | 7.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2001 | 5.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 2002 | 17.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +241.2% |
| 2003 | 10.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.1% |
| 2004 | 11.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2005 | 37.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +219.9% |
| 2006 | 12.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.4% |
| 2007 | -1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -113.8% |
| 2008 | 25.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -1596.1% |
| 2009 | 10.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.0% |
| 2010 | 5.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.8% |
| 2011 | 5.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2012 | 6.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2013 | 6.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2014 | 4.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 2015 | 11.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.9% |
| 2016 | 14.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.4% |
| 2017 | 13.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2018 | 13.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2019 | 15.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2020 | 15.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2021 | 15.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2022 | 16.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2023 | 13.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 13.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 30 Saint Lucia 230.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Afghanistan 219.02 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Albania 210.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Somalia 193.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Ethiopia 190.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Barbados 186.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 North Macedonia 183.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Upper middle income was 13.69 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 37.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Upper middle income ranks 33rd out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 101.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.