Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 27.19 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
27.19 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 87.1%
Rank
11th
of 43 groups
All-time high
481.48 % change on previous year
in 1993
All-time low
-87.38 % change on previous year
in 1992
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Upper middle income stood at 27.19 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 87.1% on the previous year and up 510.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Upper middle income peaked at 481.48 % change on previous year in 1993 and was at its lowest, -87.38 % change on previous year, in 1992.
That places Upper middle income 11th out of 43 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 125.3 % change on previous year | — |
| 1962 | -3.34 % change on previous year | -102.7% |
| 1963 | -14.52 % change on previous year | +334.5% |
| 1964 | -19.58 % change on previous year | +34.8% |
| 1965 | 9.56 % change on previous year | -148.8% |
| 1966 | 35.9 % change on previous year | +275.7% |
| 1967 | -14.06 % change on previous year | -139.2% |
| 1968 | 16.62 % change on previous year | -218.2% |
| 1969 | -13.7 % change on previous year | -182.5% |
| 1970 | 0.4688 % change on previous year | -103.4% |
| 1971 | -3.11 % change on previous year | -763.6% |
| 1972 | -14.13 % change on previous year | +354.1% |
| 1973 | -24.67 % change on previous year | +74.7% |
| 1974 | -28.04 % change on previous year | +13.6% |
| 1975 | -15.17 % change on previous year | -45.9% |
| 1976 | 3.25 % change on previous year | -121.4% |
| 1977 | -40.55 % change on previous year | -1347.0% |
| 1978 | 39.74 % change on previous year | -198.0% |
| 1979 | 84.83 % change on previous year | +113.5% |
| 1980 | 40.26 % change on previous year | -52.5% |
| 1981 | -21.21 % change on previous year | -152.7% |
| 1982 | 99.3 % change on previous year | -568.3% |
| 1983 | -3.03 % change on previous year | -103.0% |
| 1984 | 5.04 % change on previous year | -266.6% |
| 1985 | 8.46 % change on previous year | +67.7% |
| 1986 | -11.91 % change on previous year | -240.8% |
| 1987 | 3.95 % change on previous year | -133.2% |
| 1988 | -18.76 % change on previous year | -575.2% |
| 1989 | -7.79 % change on previous year | -58.5% |
| 1990 | -9.98 % change on previous year | +28.2% |
| 1991 | 82.59 % change on previous year | -927.2% |
| 1992 | -87.38 % change on previous year | -205.8% |
| 1993 | 481.48 % change on previous year | -651.0% |
| 1994 | -10.19 % change on previous year | -102.1% |
| 1995 | 28.94 % change on previous year | -383.9% |
| 1996 | -26.18 % change on previous year | -190.5% |
| 1997 | -11.48 % change on previous year | -56.2% |
| 1998 | 21.26 % change on previous year | -285.3% |
| 1999 | 54.35 % change on previous year | +155.7% |
| 2000 | 1.89 % change on previous year | -96.5% |
| 2001 | 43.45 % change on previous year | +2195.2% |
| 2002 | 51.56 % change on previous year | +18.7% |
| 2003 | 53.18 % change on previous year | +3.1% |
| 2004 | 26.28 % change on previous year | -50.6% |
| 2005 | 177.88 % change on previous year | +576.8% |
| 2006 | -45.22 % change on previous year | -125.4% |
| 2007 | -21.84 % change on previous year | -51.7% |
| 2008 | 2.69 % change on previous year | -112.3% |
| 2009 | -3.47 % change on previous year | -229.2% |
| 2010 | -23.57 % change on previous year | +579.0% |
| 2011 | 6.71 % change on previous year | -128.5% |
| 2012 | -27.57 % change on previous year | -510.6% |
| 2013 | -6.63 % change on previous year | -76.0% |
| 2014 | -2.37 % change on previous year | -64.3% |
| 2015 | -8.78 % change on previous year | +270.7% |
| 2016 | 0.5739 % change on previous year | -106.5% |
| 2017 | 20.59 % change on previous year | +3487.9% |
| 2018 | 1.28 % change on previous year | -93.8% |
| 2019 | -5.66 % change on previous year | -541.2% |
| 2020 | 17.24 % change on previous year | -404.8% |
| 2021 | 6.26 % change on previous year | -63.7% |
| 2022 | 211.49 % change on previous year | +3280.4% |
| 2023 | 27.19 % change on previous year | -87.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13.57 % change on previous year | -19.58 % change on previous year | 125.3 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2618 % change on previous year | -40.55 % change on previous year | 84.83 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.43 % change on previous year | -21.21 % change on previous year | 99.3 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 52.34 % change on previous year | -87.38 % change on previous year | 481.48 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 28.64 % change on previous year | -45.22 % change on previous year | 177.88 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -4.54 % change on previous year | -27.57 % change on previous year | 20.59 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 65.55 % change on previous year | 6.26 % change on previous year | 211.49 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 8 Moldova 238.49 % change on previous year compare
- 9 Lithuania 200 % change on previous year compare
- 10 Trinidad and Tobago 172.92 % change on previous year compare
- 11 Gambia 171.1 % change on previous year compare
- 12 Turkey 165.27 % change on previous year compare
- 13 Vanuatu 137.47 % change on previous year compare
- 14 Serbia 125.45 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Upper middle income was 27.19 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 481.48 % change on previous year in 1993.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -87.38 % change on previous year in 1992.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Upper middle income ranks 11th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 510.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.