Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Argentina
Argentina: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 4.38 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Argentina, 1960–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Argentina is 4.38 million current US$, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 52.9% on the previous year and up 17.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Argentina peaked at 68.00 million current US$ in 1962 and was at its lowest, -10.00 million current US$, in 1992.
That places Argentina 117th out of 164 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Argentina, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 45.00 million current US$ | — |
| 1961 | 41.00 million current US$ | -8.9% |
| 1962 | 68.00 million current US$ | +65.9% |
| 1963 | 11.00 million current US$ | -83.8% |
| 1964 | 7.00 million current US$ | -36.4% |
| 1965 | -3.24 million current US$ | -146.3% |
| 1966 | 7.55 million current US$ | -333.0% |
| 1967 | 5.36 million current US$ | -29.0% |
| 1968 | 17.21 million current US$ | +221.1% |
| 1969 | 18.00 million current US$ | +4.6% |
| 1970 | 1.00 million current US$ | -94.4% |
| 1971 | -2.00 million current US$ | -300.0% |
| 1972 | -3.00 million current US$ | +50.0% |
| 1973 | -2.00 million current US$ | -33.3% |
| 1974 | 1.00 million current US$ | -150.0% |
| 1975 | -5.00 million current US$ | -600.0% |
| 1976 | -5.00 million current US$ | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -5.00 million current US$ | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -5.00 million current US$ | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -4.00 million current US$ | -20.0% |
| 1980 | -1.00 million current US$ | -75.0% |
| 1981 | -1.00 million current US$ | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -2.00 million current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1983 | -2.00 million current US$ | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -2.00 million current US$ | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -2.00 million current US$ | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -2.00 million current US$ | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -10.00 million current US$ | +400.0% |
| 1993 | -10.00 million current US$ | -0.0% |
| 1994 | 2.00 million current US$ | -120.0% |
| 1995 | 1.57 million current US$ | -21.6% |
| 1996 | 1.14 million current US$ | -27.6% |
| 1997 | 702,500 current US$ | -38.1% |
| 1998 | 270,000 current US$ | -61.6% |
| 1999 | 390,000 current US$ | +44.4% |
| 2000 | -2.47 million current US$ | -733.3% |
| 2001 | -470,000 current US$ | -81.0% |
| 2002 | 1.61 million current US$ | -442.6% |
| 2003 | 10.37 million current US$ | +544.1% |
| 2004 | 1.82 million current US$ | -82.4% |
| 2005 | 1.36 million current US$ | -25.3% |
| 2006 | 1.97 million current US$ | +44.9% |
| 2007 | 7.82 million current US$ | +297.0% |
| 2008 | 7.17 million current US$ | -8.3% |
| 2009 | 2.62 million current US$ | -63.5% |
| 2010 | 3.77 million current US$ | +43.9% |
| 2011 | 9.59 million current US$ | +154.4% |
| 2012 | 9.69 million current US$ | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 3.73 million current US$ | -61.5% |
| 2014 | 1.11 million current US$ | -70.2% |
| 2015 | -4.32 million current US$ | -488.7% |
| 2016 | -780,044 current US$ | -81.9% |
| 2017 | 1.32 million current US$ | -269.4% |
| 2018 | 4.21 million current US$ | +218.9% |
| 2019 | 1.10 million current US$ | -74.0% |
| 2020 | 6.02 million current US$ | +449.6% |
| 2021 | 5.44 million current US$ | -9.7% |
| 2022 | 2.86 million current US$ | -47.4% |
| 2023 | 4.38 million current US$ | +52.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 21.69 million current US$ | -3.24 million current US$ | 68.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | -2.90 million current US$ | -5.00 million current US$ | 1.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.71 million current US$ | -2.00 million current US$ | -1.00 million current US$ | 7 |
| 1990s | -1.74 million current US$ | -10.00 million current US$ | 2.00 million current US$ | 8 |
| 2000s | 3.18 million current US$ | -2.47 million current US$ | 10.37 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.94 million current US$ | -4.32 million current US$ | 9.69 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.68 million current US$ | 2.86 million current US$ | 6.02 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
- 114 Solomon Islands 5.55 million current US$ compare
- 115 Guinea-Bissau 5.33 million current US$ compare
- 116 Turkmenistan 4.56 million current US$ compare
- 118 Algeria 3.86 million current US$ compare
- 119 Vanuatu 3.49 million current US$ compare
- 120 Guyana 3.34 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Argentina
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 771,717 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 5,407 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 826,386 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 16.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 245,587 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany -3.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 27.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 812,756 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -16.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 207,117 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Argentina?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Argentina was 4.38 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 68.00 million current US$ in 1962.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was -10.00 million current US$ in 1992.
- How does Argentina rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Argentina ranks 117th out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.