Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Guatemala
Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 234.16 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Guatemala, 1960–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Guatemala stood at 234.16 million current US$.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.3% on the previous year and up 128.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Guatemala peaked at 252.41 million current US$ in 2021 and was at its lowest, -1.00 million current US$, in 1996.
That places Guatemala 32nd out of 164 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 16.00 million current US$ | — |
| 1961 | 15.00 million current US$ | -6.2% |
| 1962 | 9.00 million current US$ | -40.0% |
| 1963 | 10.00 million current US$ | +11.1% |
| 1964 | 11.00 million current US$ | +10.0% |
| 1965 | 10.94 million current US$ | -0.5% |
| 1966 | 8.01 million current US$ | -26.8% |
| 1967 | 12.39 million current US$ | +54.7% |
| 1968 | 14.08 million current US$ | +13.6% |
| 1969 | 11.00 million current US$ | -21.9% |
| 1970 | 12.00 million current US$ | +9.1% |
| 1971 | 10.00 million current US$ | -16.7% |
| 1972 | 16.00 million current US$ | +60.0% |
| 1973 | 15.00 million current US$ | -6.2% |
| 1974 | 18.00 million current US$ | +20.0% |
| 1975 | 23.00 million current US$ | +27.8% |
| 1976 | 29.00 million current US$ | +26.1% |
| 1977 | 26.00 million current US$ | -10.3% |
| 1978 | 13.00 million current US$ | -50.0% |
| 1979 | 19.00 million current US$ | +46.2% |
| 1980 | 17.00 million current US$ | -10.5% |
| 1981 | 18.00 million current US$ | +5.9% |
| 1982 | 20.00 million current US$ | +11.1% |
| 1983 | 36.00 million current US$ | +80.0% |
| 1984 | 29.00 million current US$ | -19.4% |
| 1985 | 50.00 million current US$ | +72.4% |
| 1986 | 86.00 million current US$ | +72.0% |
| 1987 | 155.00 million current US$ | +80.2% |
| 1988 | 134.00 million current US$ | -13.5% |
| 1989 | 146.00 million current US$ | +9.0% |
| 1990 | 88.00 million current US$ | -39.7% |
| 1991 | 75.00 million current US$ | -14.8% |
| 1992 | 106.00 million current US$ | +41.3% |
| 1993 | 72.00 million current US$ | -32.1% |
| 1994 | 54.00 million current US$ | -25.0% |
| 1995 | 37.00 million current US$ | -31.5% |
| 1996 | -1.00 million current US$ | -102.7% |
| 1997 | 35.00 million current US$ | -3600.0% |
| 1998 | 33.05 million current US$ | -5.6% |
| 1999 | 51.75 million current US$ | +56.6% |
| 2000 | 57.96 million current US$ | +12.0% |
| 2001 | 63.60 million current US$ | +9.7% |
| 2002 | 64.73 million current US$ | +1.8% |
| 2003 | 67.94 million current US$ | +5.0% |
| 2004 | 53.54 million current US$ | -21.2% |
| 2005 | 38.36 million current US$ | -28.4% |
| 2006 | 67.25 million current US$ | +75.3% |
| 2007 | 45.71 million current US$ | -32.0% |
| 2008 | 70.35 million current US$ | +53.9% |
| 2009 | 83.89 million current US$ | +19.2% |
| 2010 | 100.50 million current US$ | +19.8% |
| 2011 | 93.08 million current US$ | -7.4% |
| 2012 | 95.49 million current US$ | +2.6% |
| 2013 | 102.67 million current US$ | +7.5% |
| 2014 | 126.04 million current US$ | +22.8% |
| 2015 | 123.50 million current US$ | -2.0% |
| 2016 | 133.41 million current US$ | +8.0% |
| 2017 | 209.69 million current US$ | +57.2% |
| 2018 | 199.71 million current US$ | -4.8% |
| 2019 | 183.48 million current US$ | -8.1% |
| 2020 | 149.70 million current US$ | -18.4% |
| 2021 | 252.41 million current US$ | +68.6% |
| 2022 | 222.34 million current US$ | -11.9% |
| 2023 | 234.16 million current US$ | +5.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11.74 million current US$ | 8.01 million current US$ | 16.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 18.10 million current US$ | 10.00 million current US$ | 29.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 69.10 million current US$ | 17.00 million current US$ | 155.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 55.08 million current US$ | -1.00 million current US$ | 106.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 61.33 million current US$ | 38.36 million current US$ | 83.89 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 136.76 million current US$ | 93.08 million current US$ | 209.69 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 214.65 million current US$ | 149.70 million current US$ | 252.41 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
More aid effectiveness data for Guatemala
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 27.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 4.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -158,126 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Guatemala?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Guatemala was 234.16 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 252.41 million current US$ in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.00 million current US$ in 1996.
- How does Guatemala rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Guatemala ranks 32nd out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 128.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.