Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Guatemala
Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 2,185 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Guatemala, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Guatemala is 2,185 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 5.3% on the previous year and up 128.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Guatemala peaked at 2,355 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, -9.33 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1996.
That places Guatemala 25th out of 162 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 139.98 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 83.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1963 | 93.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1964 | 102.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1965 | 102.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1966 | 74.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.8% |
| 1967 | 115.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.7% |
| 1968 | 131.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1969 | 102.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 1970 | 111.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1971 | 93.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1972 | 149.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.0% |
| 1973 | 139.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1974 | 167.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1975 | 214.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 1976 | 270.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1977 | 242.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1978 | 121.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1979 | 177.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.2% |
| 1980 | 158.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1981 | 167.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1982 | 186.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1983 | 335.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.0% |
| 1984 | 270.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.4% |
| 1985 | 466.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.4% |
| 1986 | 802.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.0% |
| 1987 | 1,446 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.2% |
| 1988 | 1,250 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1989 | 1,362 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1990 | 821.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.7% |
| 1991 | 699.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 1992 | 989.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 1993 | 671.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.1% |
| 1994 | 503.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1995 | 345.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 1996 | -9.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -102.7% |
| 1997 | 326.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -3600.0% |
| 1998 | 308.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1999 | 482.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.6% |
| 2000 | 540.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2001 | 593.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2002 | 604.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2003 | 634 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2004 | 499.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 2005 | 357.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.4% |
| 2006 | 627.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.3% |
| 2007 | 426.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.0% |
| 2008 | 656.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.9% |
| 2009 | 782.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 2010 | 937.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 2011 | 868.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 2012 | 891.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2013 | 958.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2014 | 1,176 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 2015 | 1,152 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2016 | 1,245 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2017 | 1,957 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.2% |
| 2018 | 1,864 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 2019 | 1,712 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2020 | 1,397 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2021 | 2,355 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.6% |
| 2022 | 2,075 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2023 | 2,185 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 105.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 74.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 139.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 168.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 93.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 270.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 644.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 158.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,446 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 514 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 989.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 572.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 357.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 782.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,276 current US$ per square kilometre | 868.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,957 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2,003 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,397 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,355 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 22 Tuvalu 3,333 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 East Timor 2,882 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Lesotho 2,785 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Armenia 2,008 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Honduras 1,942 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Afghanistan 1,806 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Guatemala
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 27.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 4.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -158,126 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Guatemala?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Guatemala was 2,185 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 2,355 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was -9.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996.
- How does Guatemala rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Guatemala ranks 25th out of 162 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 128.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.