Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in High income
High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2.01 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 22.7%
Rank
42nd
of 44 groups
All-time high
66.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1985
All-time low
-1.06 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in High income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
High income recorded 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in 2023.
The figure is up 22.7% on the previous year and up 137.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in High income peaked at 66.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 1985 and was at its lowest, -1.06 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1999.
That places High income 42nd out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in High income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 15.37 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 13.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 1963 | 15.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1964 | 10.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 1965 | 12.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 1966 | 10.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 1967 | 9.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1968 | 10.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1969 | 11.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1970 | 9.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1971 | 8.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1972 | 11.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1973 | 9.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 1974 | 4.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.1% |
| 1975 | 19.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +345.2% |
| 1976 | 24.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1977 | 28.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1978 | 29.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1979 | 36.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 1980 | 26.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 1981 | 25.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1982 | 27.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1983 | 45.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.6% |
| 1984 | 44.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1985 | 66.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.8% |
| 1986 | 64.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1987 | 43.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 1988 | 41.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1989 | 40.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1990 | 42.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1991 | 39.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 1992 | 38.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1993 | 26.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 1994 | 28.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1995 | 7.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.5% |
| 1996 | 43.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +496.5% |
| 1997 | -0.6161 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.4% |
| 1998 | 0.2899 current US$ per square kilometre | -147.1% |
| 1999 | -1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -464.3% |
| 2000 | -0.5083 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.9% |
| 2001 | 0.277 current US$ per square kilometre | -154.5% |
| 2002 | 0.6374 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.1% |
| 2003 | 0.9164 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.8% |
| 2004 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.0% |
| 2005 | 0.9142 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 2006 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.0% |
| 2007 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2008 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2009 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2010 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 2011 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2012 | 0.7839 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 2013 | 0.8468 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2014 | 0.7327 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2015 | 0.5002 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.7% |
| 2016 | 0.5112 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2017 | 0.7161 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.1% |
| 2018 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +145.9% |
| 2019 | 0.5064 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.2% |
| 2020 | 0.7003 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.3% |
| 2021 | 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +115.9% |
| 2022 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2023 | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 18.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 42.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 66.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 22.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.933 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5083 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8776 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5002 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7003 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near High income
- 39 Senegal 1,296 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Gambia 1,225 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 South Sudan 1,123 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Cyprus 1,082 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Djibouti 1,037 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Nigeria 1,026 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1,006 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for High income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 327,620 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 0 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.06 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 233,494 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 7.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 61.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 277,565 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 902,924 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 213.34 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in High income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in High income was 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in High income?
- The highest recorded value was 66.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 1985.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in High income?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- How does High income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- High income ranks 42nd out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in High income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 137.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this High income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.