Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Jamaica
Jamaica: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 4,147 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
4,147 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 34.4%
World rank
17th
of 162 countries
All-time high
10,157 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1982
All-time low
-2,415 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2000
Years of data
62
1962–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Jamaica, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Jamaica stood at 4,147 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 34.4% on the previous year and up 3,251.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Jamaica peaked at 10,157 current US$ per square kilometre in 1982 and was at its lowest, -2,415 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2000.
Jamaica ranks 17th of 162 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Jamaica, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 184.67 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 277.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1964 | 277.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 360.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1966 | 444.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 1967 | 533.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 1968 | 461.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1969 | 277.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1970 | 369.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1971 | 554.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1972 | 461.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1973 | 461.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 831.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.0% |
| 1975 | 923.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1976 | 831.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1977 | 831.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 2,124 current US$ per square kilometre | +155.6% |
| 1979 | 2,124 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 1,477 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 1981 | 5,817 current US$ per square kilometre | +293.7% |
| 1982 | 10,157 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.6% |
| 1983 | 10,065 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1984 | 9,141 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1985 | 9,326 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1986 | 9,603 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1987 | 8,218 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 1988 | 5,540 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.6% |
| 1989 | 8,310 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1990 | 9,603 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1991 | 4,986 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.1% |
| 1992 | 6,094 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1993 | 5,540 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1994 | 3,970 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 1995 | 2,585 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.9% |
| 1996 | -646.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -125.0% |
| 1997 | -2,124 current US$ per square kilometre | +228.6% |
| 1998 | -1,077 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.3% |
| 1999 | -1,413 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 2000 | -2,415 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.9% |
| 2001 | -1,647 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.8% |
| 2002 | -1,015 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.4% |
| 2003 | 108.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -110.7% |
| 2004 | 1,075 current US$ per square kilometre | +886.4% |
| 2005 | 1,641 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.7% |
| 2006 | 866.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.2% |
| 2007 | -511.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -159.1% |
| 2008 | -82.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.9% |
| 2009 | -189.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.3% |
| 2010 | -350.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.4% |
| 2011 | -45.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.1% |
| 2012 | 192.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -526.5% |
| 2013 | 123.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.9% |
| 2014 | 948.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +666.4% |
| 2015 | 1,285 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.5% |
| 2016 | 1,302 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2017 | 2,169 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.5% |
| 2018 | 2,546 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 2019 | 1,565 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 2020 | 1,235 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 2021 | 2,261 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.1% |
| 2022 | 3,085 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.5% |
| 2023 | 4,147 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 351.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 184.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 533.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 951.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 369.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,124 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 7,765 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,477 current US$ per square kilometre | 10,157 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2,752 current US$ per square kilometre | -2,124 current US$ per square kilometre | 9,603 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -216.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -2,415 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,641 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 973.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -350.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,546 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2,682 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,235 current US$ per square kilometre | 4,147 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Jamaica
- 14 Malawi 4,574 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Syria 4,518 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Tonga 4,194 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Eswatini 3,547 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Bangladesh 3,461 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Uganda 3,407 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Jamaica
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24,581 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 208,545 current US$ (2018)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 9.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 20,000 current US$ (2006)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany -618,920 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 391,268 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 4.29 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 15,316 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.90 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Jamaica?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Jamaica was 4,147 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Jamaica?
- The highest recorded value was 10,157 current US$ per square kilometre in 1982.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Jamaica?
- The lowest recorded value was -2,415 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000.
- How does Jamaica rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Jamaica ranks 17th out of 162 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Jamaica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3,251.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Jamaica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.