Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 734.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
734.66 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 13.8%
Rank
5th
of 44 groups
All-time high
734.66 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
33.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1973
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Low & middle income is 734.66 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 13.8% on the previous year and up 123.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Low & middle income peaked at 734.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 33.14 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1973.
That places Low & middle income 5th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 38.43 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 41.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1963 | 43.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1964 | 42.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1965 | 43.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1966 | 44.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1967 | 40.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1968 | 37.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1969 | 34.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1970 | 37.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1971 | 40.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1972 | 38.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1973 | 33.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 1974 | 36.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1975 | 41.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 1976 | 40.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1977 | 41.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1978 | 50.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1979 | 58.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1980 | 62.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1981 | 62.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1982 | 69.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1983 | 77.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1984 | 90.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1985 | 112.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 1986 | 106.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1987 | 100.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1988 | 95.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1989 | 96.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1990 | 117.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1991 | 132.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1992 | 103.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 1993 | 94.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1994 | 92.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1995 | 72.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 1996 | 90.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 1997 | 64.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 1998 | 78.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1999 | 90.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2000 | 96.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2001 | 108.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 2002 | 138.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 2003 | 187 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.3% |
| 2004 | 209.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 2005 | 330.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.7% |
| 2006 | 275.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 2007 | 244.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 2008 | 299 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 2009 | 322.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2010 | 331.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2011 | 352.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2012 | 316.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2013 | 328.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2014 | 343.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2015 | 331.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2016 | 354.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2017 | 371.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2018 | 372 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2019 | 357.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2020 | 368.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2021 | 470.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.7% |
| 2022 | 645.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.1% |
| 2023 | 734.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 40.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 41.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 58.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 87.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 62.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 112.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 93.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 64.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 132.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 221.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 96.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 330.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 345.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 316.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 372 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 554.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 368.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 734.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 2 Micronesia, Federated States of 142,906 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Israel 104,113 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Lebanon 39,126 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Palestine, State of 24,264 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Ukraine 20,349 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Palau 17,503 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Jordan 14,103 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Low & middle income was 734.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 734.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 33.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 1973.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Low & middle income ranks 5th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 123.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.