Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Mexico
Mexico: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 119.05 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
119.05 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 39.0%
World rank
110th
of 162 countries
All-time high
191.42 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
-28.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1964
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Mexico, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Mexico recorded 119.05 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 39.0% on the previous year and up 6.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Mexico peaked at 191.42 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, -28.29 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1964.
That places Mexico 110th out of 162 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Mexico, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 43.73 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 10.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.3% |
| 1963 | -9.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -185.7% |
| 1964 | -28.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +205.6% |
| 1965 | 19.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -168.8% |
| 1966 | 14.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 1967 | 7.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.0% |
| 1968 | 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.3% |
| 1969 | 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.6% |
| 1970 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.2% |
| 1971 | -1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -150.0% |
| 1972 | -0.5144 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1973 | -1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1974 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -200.0% |
| 1975 | -1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -250.0% |
| 1976 | -1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1977 | -3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +250.0% |
| 1978 | -2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 1979 | 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -400.0% |
| 1980 | 4.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1981 | 4.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1983 | 18 current US$ per square kilometre | +218.2% |
| 1984 | 8.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.4% |
| 1985 | 29.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +235.3% |
| 1986 | 26.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 1987 | 31.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 1988 | 24.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 1989 | 9.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.7% |
| 1990 | 11.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 1991 | 12.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1992 | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.0% |
| 1993 | 10.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.8% |
| 1994 | 0.5144 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.0% |
| 1995 | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1996 | 13.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +766.7% |
| 1997 | 4.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.2% |
| 1998 | 4.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1999 | 6.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.4% |
| 2000 | 12.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.4% |
| 2001 | 21.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.6% |
| 2002 | 43.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.8% |
| 2003 | 29.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 2004 | 22 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 2005 | 66.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.2% |
| 2006 | 78.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 2007 | 43.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.5% |
| 2008 | 52.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.6% |
| 2009 | 66.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 2010 | 105.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.4% |
| 2011 | 191.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.5% |
| 2012 | 108.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.3% |
| 2013 | 112.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2014 | 117.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2015 | 130.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2016 | 69.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.7% |
| 2017 | 95.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 2018 | 119.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.2% |
| 2019 | 81.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.1% |
| 2020 | 89.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2021 | 78.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 2022 | 85.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2023 | 119.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | -0.1543 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5144 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 43.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 78.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 113.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 191.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 93.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 78.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 119.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 107 Romania 165.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 108 Belarus 155.55 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 109 Grenada 145.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 111 Uzbekistan 117.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 112 Namibia 102.59 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 113 Botswana 95.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Mexico
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 6.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,627 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 8.90 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions -75.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 83.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 132.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 5.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.81 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Mexico?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Mexico was 119.05 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 191.42 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was -28.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does Mexico rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Mexico ranks 110th out of 162 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.