Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 625.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
625.37 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 20.3%
Rank
10th
of 44 groups
All-time high
625.37 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
3.77 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Sub-Saharan Africa is 625.37 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 20.3% on the previous year and up 60.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Sub-Saharan Africa peaked at 625.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Sub-Saharan Africa 10th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Sub-Saharan Africa, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 9.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +161.8% |
| 1963 | 8.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 1964 | 8.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1965 | 12.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.8% |
| 1966 | 12.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1967 | 10.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 1968 | 9.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1969 | 9.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1970 | 8.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1971 | 10.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.6% |
| 1972 | 8.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 1973 | 7.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1974 | 9.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.2% |
| 1975 | 10.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1976 | 12.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1977 | 13.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1978 | 16.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 1979 | 22.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.2% |
| 1980 | 31.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.6% |
| 1981 | 36.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1982 | 34.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1983 | 39.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1984 | 44.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1985 | 69.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.2% |
| 1986 | 47.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.0% |
| 1987 | 43.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1988 | 40.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1989 | 41.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1990 | 54.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 1991 | 52.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1992 | 64.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 1993 | 72.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1994 | 86.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1995 | 59.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.9% |
| 1996 | 44.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.6% |
| 1997 | 65.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.7% |
| 1998 | 52.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1999 | 63.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 2000 | 69.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2001 | 64.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2002 | 111.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.3% |
| 2003 | 218.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +95.8% |
| 2004 | 163.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 2005 | 189.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 2006 | 261.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.8% |
| 2007 | 213.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 2008 | 312.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.8% |
| 2009 | 347.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2010 | 346.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2011 | 416.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 2012 | 360 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2013 | 389.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2014 | 395.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2015 | 393.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2016 | 413.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2017 | 469.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2018 | 443.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2019 | 392.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 2020 | 471.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 2021 | 559.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 2022 | 519.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2023 | 625.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 12.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 42.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 61.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 86.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 195.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 64.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 347.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 402 current US$ per square kilometre | 346.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 469.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 544.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 471.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 625.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa
- 7 Palau 17,503 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Jordan 14,103 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Haiti 12,349 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 El Salvador 7,463 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Rwanda 7,252 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Maldives 5,524 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Republic of Moldova 5,481 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 121.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 460.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.49 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.04 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 658.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.95 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.40 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 303.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.70 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Sub-Saharan Africa was 625.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 625.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Sub-Saharan Africa rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 60.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.