Net official development assistance and official aid received in East Asia & Pacific
East Asia & Pacific: Net official development assistance and official aid received was 429.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Net official development assistance and official aid received in East Asia & Pacific, 1961–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific recorded 429.49 current US$ per square kilometre for net official development assistance and official aid received in 2021.
The figure is down 17.3% on the previous year and up 40.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official development assistance and official aid received in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 519.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 32.83 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1964.
That places East Asia & Pacific 36th out of 44 groups with data for 2021, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official development assistance and official aid received in East Asia & Pacific, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 34.46 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 36.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1963 | 37.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1964 | 32.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1965 | 44.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.2% |
| 1966 | 52.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 1967 | 60.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1968 | 62.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1969 | 69.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1970 | 72.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1971 | 83.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 1972 | 94.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1973 | 99.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1974 | 117.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1975 | 102.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1976 | 90.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1977 | 91.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1978 | 120.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.8% |
| 1979 | 142.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 1980 | 160.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1981 | 179.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1982 | 161.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1983 | 163.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1984 | 167.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1985 | 168.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1986 | 211.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 1987 | 250.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1988 | 290.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1989 | 305.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1990 | 330.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1991 | 319.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1992 | 415.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.1% |
| 1993 | 397.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1994 | 405.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1995 | 428.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1996 | 346.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 1997 | 291.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 1998 | 362.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 1999 | 417.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2000 | 360.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 2001 | 313.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2002 | 314.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2003 | 299.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2004 | 317.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2005 | 378.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 2006 | 308.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 2007 | 340.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2008 | 345.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2009 | 388.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2010 | 385.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2011 | 306.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 2012 | 362.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2013 | 491.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.4% |
| 2014 | 388.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.9% |
| 2015 | 348.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2016 | 315.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2017 | 343.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2018 | 338.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2019 | 290.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 2020 | 519.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.6% |
| 2021 | 429.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 47.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 101.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 72.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 142.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 205.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 160.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 305.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 371.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 291.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 428.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 336.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 299.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 388.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 357.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 290.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 491.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 474.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 429.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 519.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific
- 33 Jordan 31,919 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Cape Verde 25,238 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Singapore 24,866 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Burundi 24,208 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 El Salvador 24,074 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Malawi 18,366 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 East Timor 17,480 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official development assistance and official aid received in East Asia & Pacific?
- Net official development assistance and official aid received in East Asia & Pacific was 429.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official development assistance and official aid received recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 519.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest net official development assistance and official aid received recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was 32.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does East Asia & Pacific rank for net official development assistance and official aid received?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 36th out of 44 groups with data for 2021.
- Is net official development assistance and official aid received rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is up 40.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official development assistance and official aid received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official development assistance and official aid received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official development assistance and official aid received (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official development assistance and official aid received Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official development assistance and official aid received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.