Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Bangladesh
Bangladesh: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square was 161.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Bangladesh, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Bangladesh stood at 161.23 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 70.4% on the previous year and up 74.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Bangladesh peaked at 545.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 23.28 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2006.
Bangladesh ranks 15th of 121 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Bangladesh, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 62.99 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 64.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1982 | 31.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.5% |
| 1983 | 35.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1984 | 48.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.0% |
| 1985 | 124.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +156.3% |
| 1986 | 177 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.2% |
| 1987 | 162.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1988 | 58.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.1% |
| 1989 | 78.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.9% |
| 1990 | 163.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +108.2% |
| 1991 | 35.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.5% |
| 1992 | 74.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +112.4% |
| 1993 | 28.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.6% |
| 1994 | 24.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1995 | 38.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.7% |
| 1996 | 43.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 1997 | 30.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 1998 | 63.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +110.1% |
| 1999 | 56.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 2000 | 96.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.9% |
| 2001 | 55.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 2002 | 45.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 2003 | 64.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.4% |
| 2004 | 64.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2005 | 65.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2006 | 23.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.5% |
| 2007 | 48.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.6% |
| 2008 | 44.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2009 | 69.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.5% |
| 2010 | 135.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +96.4% |
| 2011 | 165.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 2012 | 125.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 2013 | 92.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.5% |
| 2014 | 147.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.7% |
| 2015 | 207.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.2% |
| 2016 | 324.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.0% |
| 2017 | 207.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.0% |
| 2018 | 112.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.0% |
| 2019 | 146.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 2020 | 210.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.3% |
| 2021 | 261.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 2022 | 545.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +108.1% |
| 2023 | 161.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 84.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 177 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 56 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 163.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 57.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 96.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 166.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 92.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 324.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 294.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 161.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 545.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bangladesh
- 12 Guinea-Bissau 185.14 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Haiti 174.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Djibouti 168.42 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Liberia 139.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Benin 132.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Republic of Moldova 111.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Bangladesh
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 2.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 196.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 37.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 176.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 155.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 71.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Bangladesh?
- Net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Bangladesh was 161.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Bangladesh?
- The highest recorded value was 545.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Bangladesh?
- The lowest recorded value was 23.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- How does Bangladesh rank for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
- Bangladesh ranks 15th out of 121 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square rising or falling in Bangladesh?
- Over the last ten years it is up 74.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bangladesh data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.