Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Central African Republic
Central African Republic: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square was 15.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Central African Republic, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Central African Republic stood at 15.14 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 38 years on record.
The figure is up 96.6% on the previous year and up 464.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Central African Republic peaked at 15.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -12.41 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2009.
That places Central African Republic 42nd out of 121 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Central African Republic, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 0.1284 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0.5618 current US$ per square kilometre | +337.5% |
| 1982 | 0.6742 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1983 | 0.5939 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 1984 | 0.4495 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.3% |
| 1985 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +303.6% |
| 1986 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.6% |
| 1988 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 1989 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 1990 | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.5% |
| 1991 | 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.4% |
| 1992 | 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.5% |
| 1993 | 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.9% |
| 1994 | 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.3% |
| 1995 | 3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1996 | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 1997 | 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1998 | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.4% |
| 1999 | 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +226.6% |
| 2000 | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.3% |
| 2001 | -0.0963 current US$ per square kilometre | -105.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0321 current US$ per square kilometre | -133.3% |
| 2009 | -12.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -38749.9% |
| 2010 | -1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.4% |
| 2011 | -0.8026 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.4% |
| 2012 | 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -420.0% |
| 2013 | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2014 | 0.8668 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.7% |
| 2015 | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.3% |
| 2016 | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +115.9% |
| 2017 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.3% |
| 2018 | -1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -190.0% |
| 2019 | 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -168.2% |
| 2020 | 0.8039 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 2021 | 3 current US$ per square kilometre | +272.6% |
| 2022 | 7.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.1% |
| 2023 | 15.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +96.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1284 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -2.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 2010s | 0.9272 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8039 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Central African Republic
- 39 Côte d'Ivoire 21.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Mali 21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Cameroon 16.02 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Zimbabwe 14.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Guyana 13.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Mauritania 10.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Central African Republic
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 14,134 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 230,599 current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 8.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 138.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 11.33 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 47.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 40.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.13 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 7.34 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Central African Republic?
- Net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Central African Republic was 15.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Central African Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 15.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Central African Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was -12.41 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- How does Central African Republic rank for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
- Central African Republic ranks 42nd out of 121 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square rising or falling in Central African Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 464.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central African Republic data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 38 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.