Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square was 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Dominican Republic, 1980–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Dominican Republic is 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2021.
The figure is up 102.9% on the previous year and up 103.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Dominican Republic peaked at 169.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, -52.94 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2019.
That places Dominican Republic 64th out of 121 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 14.49 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | -1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -108.6% |
| 1982 | 20.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -1766.7% |
| 1983 | 27.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.0% |
| 1984 | 38.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.4% |
| 1985 | 40.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1986 | 40.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1987 | 108.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.3% |
| 1988 | -3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -103.1% |
| 1989 | 22.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -793.8% |
| 1990 | 45.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.2% |
| 1991 | -46.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -201.8% |
| 1992 | -21.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.1% |
| 1993 | 5.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -125.7% |
| 1994 | -14.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -359.3% |
| 1995 | -24.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.1% |
| 1996 | -35.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.3% |
| 1997 | -19.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.5% |
| 1998 | -24.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.0% |
| 1999 | -6 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.6% |
| 2000 | 30.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -600.0% |
| 2002 | 19.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.5% |
| 2003 | 53.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +170.5% |
| 2004 | -11.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -121.8% |
| 2005 | -13.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2006 | 8.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -163.5% |
| 2007 | -15.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -290.0% |
| 2008 | -26.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.7% |
| 2009 | -26.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -27.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2011 | -28.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2012 | -1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.9% |
| 2013 | -9.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +557.1% |
| 2014 | 75.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -893.5% |
| 2015 | 35.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.7% |
| 2016 | 169.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +375.0% |
| 2017 | 25.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.2% |
| 2018 | -38.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -254.8% |
| 2019 | -52.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 2020 | -35.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.2% |
| 2021 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -102.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 30.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 108.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | -14.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 45.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2010s | 14.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 169.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | -17.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
- 61 Afghanistan 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 62 Somalia 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 63 Iraq 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 65 Tanzania, United Republic of 0.7736 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 66 Mexico 0.2759 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 67 Cuba 0.2136 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Dominican Republic
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 29,645 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 9,516 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 24.06 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions -8.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 22,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 218.83 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 498,028 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 84,623 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.63 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Dominican Republic?
- Net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Dominican Republic was 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 169.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was -52.94 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
- Dominican Republic ranks 64th out of 121 countries with data for 2021.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 103.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 41 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.