Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Indonesia
Indonesia: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square was -2.03 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Indonesia, 1981–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Indonesia is -2.03 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 37.9% on the previous year and down 123.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Indonesia peaked at 20.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, -3.65 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2021.
That places Indonesia 92nd out of 121 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Indonesia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1981 | 0.2594 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +480.9% |
| 1983 | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 1984 | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1985 | 6.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +244.2% |
| 1986 | 7.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1987 | 8.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1988 | 5.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.7% |
| 1989 | 5.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1990 | 4.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 1991 | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.2% |
| 1992 | -1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -151.7% |
| 1993 | 0.2318 current US$ per square kilometre | -118.5% |
| 1994 | -0.5354 current US$ per square kilometre | -331.0% |
| 1995 | -0.0166 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.9% |
| 1996 | 0.8943 current US$ per square kilometre | -5500.0% |
| 1997 | 0.9219 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1998 | -2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -329.3% |
| 1999 | -2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -3.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.6% |
| 2001 | 3.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -197.9% |
| 2002 | -1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -141.7% |
| 2003 | -0.5806 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.8% |
| 2004 | -1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.6% |
| 2005 | -2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.5% |
| 2006 | -0.767 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.4% |
| 2007 | 0.9054 current US$ per square kilometre | -218.1% |
| 2008 | 0.3835 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.6% |
| 2009 | -0.8096 current US$ per square kilometre | -311.1% |
| 2010 | 3.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -550.7% |
| 2011 | 20.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +457.8% |
| 2012 | 5.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.8% |
| 2013 | 8.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.4% |
| 2014 | 4.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.9% |
| 2015 | 6.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 2016 | 8.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.7% |
| 2017 | 5.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.0% |
| 2018 | -0.092 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.5% |
| 2019 | -0.1268 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.8% |
| 2020 | 6.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -5501.4% |
| 2021 | -3.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -153.3% |
| 2022 | -3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2023 | -2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2594 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | 0.3207 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.604 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1268 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.528 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Indonesia
- 89 Guinea -1.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 90 Solomon Islands -1.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 91 Morocco -1.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 93 Thailand -2.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 94 Tunisia -2.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 95 Yemen -2.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Indonesia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 10.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 69.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 19.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 20.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 107.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 102.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 20.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 102.57 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Indonesia?
- Net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Indonesia was -2.03 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Indonesia?
- The highest recorded value was 20.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Indonesia?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- How does Indonesia rank for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
- Indonesia ranks 92nd out of 121 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square rising or falling in Indonesia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 123.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Indonesia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 43 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.