Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Syrian Arab Republic
Syrian Arab Republic: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square was -0.3733 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Syrian Arab Republic, 1984–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Syrian Arab Republic stood at -0.3733 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 82.7% on the previous year and up 96.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Syrian Arab Republic peaked at 34.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 1986 and was at its lowest, -22.85 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1991.
That places Syrian Arab Republic 75th out of 121 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Syrian Arab Republic, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 11.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +863.6% |
| 1986 | 34.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +201.4% |
| 1987 | 10.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.9% |
| 1990 | 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.3% |
| 1991 | -22.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -618.5% |
| 1992 | -4.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -79.3% |
| 1993 | 0.0544 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.1% |
| 1994 | 0.9794 current US$ per square kilometre | +1700.0% |
| 1995 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 1996 | 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +600.0% |
| 1997 | 7.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1998 | -0.3809 current US$ per square kilometre | -105.3% |
| 1999 | 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -542.9% |
| 2000 | 24.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +1335.5% |
| 2001 | 5.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.5% |
| 2002 | -1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -134.0% |
| 2003 | 11.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -735.9% |
| 2004 | -10.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -187.0% |
| 2005 | -4.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.1% |
| 2006 | -20.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +326.5% |
| 2007 | 10.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -150.3% |
| 2008 | 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.0% |
| 2009 | 27.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +534.6% |
| 2010 | 27.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2011 | 15.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.7% |
| 2012 | 7.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.8% |
| 2013 | -10.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -246.7% |
| 2014 | -9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2015 | -9.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2016 | -7.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 2017 | -14.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.2% |
| 2018 | -7.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.5% |
| 2019 | -2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.5% |
| 2020 | -0.9754 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.4% |
| 2021 | -2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +115.5% |
| 2022 | -2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2023 | -0.3733 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 14.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1990s | -0.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | -1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3733 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Syrian Arab Republic
- 72 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of -0.1165 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 73 Bolivia, Plurinational State of -0.159 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 74 Algeria -0.3275 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 76 Angola -0.4364 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 77 Mongolia -0.4851 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 78 Brazil -0.5298 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Syrian Arab Republic
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 15.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 31.43 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 74.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 226.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 46.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 820.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 72.15 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 136.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 37.74 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 67.51 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Syrian Arab Republic?
- Net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Syrian Arab Republic was -0.3733 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Syrian Arab Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 34.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 1986.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Syrian Arab Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was -22.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991.
- How does Syrian Arab Republic rank for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 75th out of 121 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square rising or falling in Syrian Arab Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 96.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Syrian Arab Republic data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 38 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.