Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP in Central Europe and the Baltics
Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP was 900,000 current US$ in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1990–2010
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Central Europe and the Baltics recorded 900,000 current US$ for net official flows from un agencies, undp in 2010.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 29.7% on the previous year and down 70.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, undp in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 5.96 million current US$ in 1999 and was at its lowest, 550,000 current US$, in 2005.
That places Central Europe and the Baltics 26th out of 45 groups with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 3.14 million current US$ | — |
| 1991 | 1.60 million current US$ | -49.0% |
| 1992 | 1.49 million current US$ | -6.9% |
| 1993 | 1.77 million current US$ | +18.8% |
| 1994 | 2.34 million current US$ | +32.2% |
| 1995 | 2.60 million current US$ | +11.1% |
| 1996 | 3.36 million current US$ | +29.2% |
| 1997 | 3.05 million current US$ | -9.2% |
| 1998 | 4.98 million current US$ | +63.3% |
| 1999 | 5.96 million current US$ | +19.7% |
| 2000 | 3.03 million current US$ | -49.2% |
| 2001 | 3.12 million current US$ | +3.0% |
| 2002 | 2.57 million current US$ | -17.6% |
| 2003 | 3.33 million current US$ | +29.6% |
| 2004 | 3.36 million current US$ | +0.9% |
| 2005 | 550,000 current US$ | -83.6% |
| 2006 | 930,000 current US$ | +69.1% |
| 2007 | 980,000 current US$ | +5.4% |
| 2008 | 1.53 million current US$ | +56.1% |
| 2009 | 1.28 million current US$ | -16.3% |
| 2010 | 900,000 current US$ | -29.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.03 million current US$ | 1.49 million current US$ | 5.96 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.07 million current US$ | 550,000 current US$ | 3.36 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 900,000 current US$ | 900,000 current US$ | 900,000 current US$ | 1 |
Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics
- 23 Nepal 6.60 million current US$ compare
- 24 Sierra Leone 6.28 million current US$ compare
- 25 Rwanda 6.03 million current US$ compare
- 26 Bangladesh 5.94 million current US$ compare
- 27 Haiti 5.67 million current US$ compare
- 28 Nigeria 5.26 million current US$ compare
- 29 Benin 4.84 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Central Europe and the Baltics
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, undp in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Net official flows from un agencies, undp in Central Europe and the Baltics was 900,000 current US$ in 2010, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, undp recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The highest recorded value was 5.96 million current US$ in 1999.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, undp recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The lowest recorded value was 550,000 current US$ in 2005.
- How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for net official flows from un agencies, undp?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 26th out of 45 groups with data for 2010.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, undp rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Over the last ten years it is down 70.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies are United Nations includes the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.