Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics
Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled was 890,000 current US$ in 2003. ▲ Rising
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1990–2003
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2003, net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics stood at 890,000 current US$.
That represents a change of up 2.3% on the previous year and up 229.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 1.16 million current US$ in 1997 and was at its lowest, 230,000 current US$, in 1994.
That places Central Europe and the Baltics 42nd out of 47 groups with data for 2003, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 790,000 current US$ | — |
| 1991 | 920,000 current US$ | +16.5% |
| 1992 | 260,000 current US$ | -71.7% |
| 1993 | 270,000 current US$ | +3.8% |
| 1994 | 230,000 current US$ | -14.8% |
| 1995 | 740,000 current US$ | +221.7% |
| 1996 | 670,000 current US$ | -9.5% |
| 1997 | 1.16 million current US$ | +73.1% |
| 1998 | 670,000 current US$ | -42.2% |
| 1999 | 780,000 current US$ | +16.4% |
| 2000 | 560,000 current US$ | -28.2% |
| 2001 | 940,000 current US$ | +67.9% |
| 2002 | 870,000 current US$ | -7.4% |
| 2003 | 890,000 current US$ | +2.3% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | +221.7% | 230,000 current US$ | 740,000 current US$ |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 649,000 current US$ | 230,000 current US$ | 1.16 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 815,000 current US$ | 560,000 current US$ | 940,000 current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics
- 39 Vietnam 3.23 million current US$ compare
- 40 Zimbabwe 3.16 million current US$ compare
- 41 Senegal 3.13 million current US$ compare
- 42 Iraq 3.10 million current US$ compare
- 43 Congo 2.95 million current US$ compare
- 44 Palestine 2.94 million current US$ compare
- 45 Sierra Leone 2.94 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Central Europe and the Baltics
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics was 890,000 current US$ in 2003, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The highest recorded value was 1.16 million current US$ in 1997.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The lowest recorded value was 230,000 current US$ in 1994.
- How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 42nd out of 47 groups with data for 2003.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Over the last ten years it is up 229.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) with 350 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) with 350 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.