Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square in Angola
Angola: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square was 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square in Angola, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square in Angola stood at 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 44 years on record.
The figure is up 12.6% on the previous year and up 7.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square in Angola peaked at 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0401 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
Angola ranks 109th of 155 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square in Angola, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 0.0401 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0.2005 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 1982 | 0.2567 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 1983 | 0.2246 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1984 | 0.1283 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 1985 | 0.2166 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.7% |
| 1986 | 0.3048 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.7% |
| 1987 | 0.6497 current US$ per square kilometre | +113.2% |
| 1988 | 0.5134 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 1989 | 0.361 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 1990 | 0.5374 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.9% |
| 1991 | 0.8182 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.2% |
| 1992 | 0.6658 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1993 | 0.6898 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1994 | 0.7379 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1995 | 0.6016 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 1996 | 0.9625 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.0% |
| 1997 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.7% |
| 1998 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1999 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2000 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 2001 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 2002 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.0% |
| 2003 | 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 2004 | 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 2006 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.3% |
| 2007 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 2008 | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2009 | 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 2010 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.6% |
| 2011 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 2012 | 2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 2013 | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 2014 | 2.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 2015 | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 2016 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 2017 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2018 | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2019 | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.7% |
| 2020 | 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2021 | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2022 | 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2023 | 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2896 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0401 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6497 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5374 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Angola
- 106 Niger 3.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 107 Sudan 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 108 Uruguay 3.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 110 Belarus 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 111 Malaysia 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 112 Solomon Islands 2.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Angola
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 684,387 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 34.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 136,131 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 26.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 231,335 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 842,610 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.46 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square in Angola?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square in Angola was 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0401 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Angola rank for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square?
- Angola ranks 109th out of 155 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.