Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square in Mozambique
Mozambique: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square was 6.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square in Mozambique, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Mozambique recorded 6.82 current US$ per square kilometre for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.8% on the previous year and up 47.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square in Mozambique peaked at 11.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.267 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
Mozambique ranks 89th of 155 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 0.267 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +361.9% |
| 1982 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 1983 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1984 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1986 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1987 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1988 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 1989 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1990 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1991 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 1992 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 1993 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.6% |
| 1994 | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 1995 | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1996 | 2.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1997 | 3.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.2% |
| 1998 | 5.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1999 | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 2000 | 4.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2001 | 7.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.5% |
| 2002 | 7.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2003 | 11.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.0% |
| 2004 | 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.9% |
| 2005 | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 2006 | 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2007 | 4.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 2008 | 7.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.3% |
| 2009 | 5.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.8% |
| 2010 | 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2011 | 5.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2012 | 5.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2013 | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 2014 | 6.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.7% |
| 2015 | 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 2016 | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.6% |
| 2017 | 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 2018 | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2019 | 5.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.3% |
| 2020 | 6.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 2021 | 6.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2022 | 7.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2023 | 6.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.267 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
- 86 Iraq 7.14 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 87 Central African Republic 6.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 88 Tanzania, United Republic of 6.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 90 Myanmar 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 91 Papua New Guinea 6.46 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 92 Ecuador 6.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Mozambique
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 12.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 17.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 55.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 143.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 35.43 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 60.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 9.71 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 38.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 33.56 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 120.62 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square in Mozambique?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square in Mozambique was 6.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 11.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.267 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Mozambique rank for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square?
- Mozambique ranks 89th out of 155 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is up 47.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.