Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics
Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled was 390,000 current US$ in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1990–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Central Europe and the Baltics recorded 390,000 current US$ for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled in 2010.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 21.9% on the previous year and down 53.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 5.85 million current US$ in 1996 and was at its lowest, 210,000 current US$, in 1990.
That places Central Europe and the Baltics 43rd out of 44 groups with data for 2010, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 210,000 current US$ | — |
| 1991 | 2.48 million current US$ | +1081.0% |
| 1992 | 1.19 million current US$ | -52.0% |
| 1993 | 880,000 current US$ | -26.1% |
| 1994 | 1.02 million current US$ | +15.9% |
| 1995 | 4.40 million current US$ | +331.4% |
| 1996 | 5.85 million current US$ | +33.0% |
| 1997 | 1.15 million current US$ | -80.3% |
| 1998 | 1.27 million current US$ | +10.4% |
| 1999 | 900,000 current US$ | -29.1% |
| 2000 | 840,000 current US$ | -6.7% |
| 2001 | 690,000 current US$ | -17.9% |
| 2002 | 700,000 current US$ | +1.4% |
| 2003 | 880,000 current US$ | +25.7% |
| 2004 | 1.01 million current US$ | +14.8% |
| 2005 | 240,000 current US$ | -76.2% |
| 2006 | 280,000 current US$ | +16.7% |
| 2007 | 300,000 current US$ | +7.1% |
| 2008 | 380,000 current US$ | +26.7% |
| 2009 | 320,000 current US$ | -15.8% |
| 2010 | 390,000 current US$ | +21.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.94 million current US$ | 210,000 current US$ | 5.85 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 564,000 current US$ | 240,000 current US$ | 1.01 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 390,000 current US$ | 390,000 current US$ | 390,000 current US$ | 1 |
Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics
- 40 Angola 5.61 million current US$ compare
- 41 Senegal 5.30 million current US$ compare
- 42 Liberia 5.07 million current US$ compare
- 43 Indonesia 4.34 million current US$ compare
- 44 Cambodia 3.73 million current US$ compare
- 45 Philippines 3.46 million current US$ compare
- 46 Turkey 3.41 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Central Europe and the Baltics
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics was 390,000 current US$ in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The highest recorded value was 5.85 million current US$ in 1996.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The lowest recorded value was 210,000 current US$ in 1990.
- How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd out of 44 groups with data for 2010.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Over the last ten years it is down 53.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) with 70 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) with 70 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.